SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1539

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Somashekar – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Gururaju – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.R.Rajagopal, Advocate, H.N.Basavaraju, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The captioned second appeal is filed by unsuccessful defendants who have questioned the concurrent findings of the Courts below wherein plaintiff's suit for specific performance of contract based on an agreement to sell dtd. 19/1/2005 is held to be proved and decreed by both the Courts.

2. For the sake of brevity, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.

3. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking enforcement of an agreement dtd. 19/1/2005. Plaintiff claims that defendants offered to sell a portion of property bearing Sy.No.457/6. Plaintiff has specifically pleaded that out of the said survey number, a portion measuring 30x100 feet was agreed to be sold by the defendants. Plaintiff has specifically pleaded that this property was originally owned by one Ningegowda who was also called as Ninga. The said original owner secured a conversion order and he was in exclusive possession till his death and after his death, his wife Ningamma inherited the properties. Plaintiff therefore claimed that Ningamma along with her family members were in need of money and therefore, for legal necessity offered to sell the suit schedule property. Pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top