SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T. V. THAMILSELVI
V. Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
M. Radhakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Dr. C. Ravichandran, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Mukunth for M/s. Sarvabhuman Associates.

JUDGMENT

The appellant herein is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.711 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, filed against the defendant/respondent herein for the relief of specific performance, directing the defendant to execute the sale deed in his favour in respect of the suit property as per the sale agreement dated 07.07.2006.

2. The defendant contested the suit and denied the alleged sale agreement with the plaintiff and also contended that the sale agreement was executed only as security for the purpose of loan transaction.

3. On hearing both sides, the trial Court had decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant/respondent herein has preferred an appeal in A.S.No.95 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore and the first appeal was allowed and the Judgment and decree passed by the trial Court was set aside. Feeling aggrieved, the plaintiff has filed this present Second Appeal.

4. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendant is the owner of the suit property and he entered into an agreement of sale with the defendant on 07.07.2006 in which the defendant agreed to sell the suit prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top