JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Petitioner-tenant is invoking the writ jurisdiction for assailing the order dtd. 27/8/2012 made by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Annexure-E whereby the grant of land made by the competent authority under Sec. 77-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 has been set at naught. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the same may be quashed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Landlord and the learned HCGP appearing for the official respondents resist the petition making submission in justification of the impugned order.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the petition papers, this Court declines indulgence in the matter inasmuch as, the being broadly in agreement with the reasoning of the Tribunal at paragraph nos. 21, 22 & 23. The same read as under:

"21. It is also significant to note that in none of the RTCs available in LCR it is no where shown as the land vested with the Government. If the land vested with the Government as per the provisions of Sec. 44 of RTC the name of the Government would have been shown in column No.9 of RTCs. However in the spot inspection report prepared by Revenue Inspector and Ta