Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAJESH RAI K.
V. Ranganath Since Dead by LRs. R. Prabhakar – Appellant
Versus
D.V. Narayana Reddy S/o Venkatarama Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners in this writ petition are seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 09.10.2012 passed in No.LRF.CR.3172/1974-75 (Annexure-A) by respondent No.2-Land Tribunal, whereby the Land Tribunal granted 'occupancy right' to respondent No.1-D.V.Narayanreddy in respect of Sy.No.24/2 measuring 3 acres 10 guntas and in Sy. No.24/3 measuring 3 acres 10 guntas (totally measuring 6 acres 20 guntas) situated at Chikka Bellandur Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk (for brevity "the subject lands").
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that their father late V Ranganath-petitioner No.1 purchased the subject lands from one Rama Reddy vide registered Sale Deed dated 28.07.1971 and the mutation record was also changed in the name of V. Ranganath as khatedar and ever since they were in possession and enjoyment of the subject lands. Respondent No.1, being fully aware about the purchase of the subject lands as an attesting witness to the said Sale Deed, he filed an application under Form 7 for grant of occupancy right under Section 45 of the KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT , 1961 (for brevity, "the Act"). The Land Tribunal passed an order dated 31.01.1981 in favo
The occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act were granted based on established tenancy, even after land ownership changes, emphasizing the primacy of RTC entries unless lawfully challeng....
If on the relevant date appellants were in cultivation and possession of the land, they are entitled to registration of the occupancy rights in respect of the land.
The court emphasized that tenants must establish lawful possession to claim occupancy rights, and any purported surrender of tenancy must follow statutory procedures under the Karnataka Land Reforms ....
The evidentiary value of the Civil Court's judgment, the presumptive value of revenue records, and the limited scope of interference in a revision petition under Sec. 121-A of the Act were the centra....
Point of Law : Land Tribunal is bound by the statutory presumption as to entries made in record of rights and order of the Tribunal without any reference to such entries and having no discussion as ....
The court reaffirmed that a sale deed executed after land vesting under state law does not confer valid title, emphasizing the priority of tenant rights as established in tenancy legislation.
The Tribunal acted beyond its jurisdiction in granting occupancy rights without notifying interested parties, violating principles of natural justice.
Proper evaluation of documentary evidence is vital in determining occupancy rights; reliance solely on revenue records without considering the broader context can lead to errors in legal judgments.
Occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act require a formal application, and family members cannot claim rights over land without such filing.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
