SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1476

M. NAGAPRASANNA
Mpp Technologies Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Rupa Banerji – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dhyan Chinnappa, Advocate, Nischal Dev B.R., Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The petitioner in the subject petition calls in question order dtd. 28/2/2022 passed by the LXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in Criminal Revision Petition No.98 of 2021 whereby the learned Sessions Judge upturns the order dtd. 8/2/2021 passed by the XX Additional Small Causes Judge and Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate & MACT, Bengaluru allowing the application filed by the petitioner under Sec. 319 of the CrPC.

2. Facts adumbrated are as follows:- The petitioner/complainant claims to be a leading name in the manufacture of sheet metal fabricated products and transformer tanks for overseas and domestic market to meet specific needs of customers and claims to have spread all over the world. The petitioner and one R.N.Banerji and Son entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ('MoU' for short) on 2/2/2006, in terms of which R.N.Banerji and Son were appointed as marketing associates of the petitioner and were required to market and install resistant doors - 'System Schroders' door and clean room and duct door manufactured by the complainant. It is the claim of the petitioner that in terms of MoU, R.N.Banerji and Son became responsible fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top