Back
H. P. SANDESH
Shivaraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. This criminal revision petition is filed to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dtd. 29/9/2011 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-II, Bengaluru in C.C.No.826/2010 and also to set aside the judgment and order of conviction dtd. 9/10/2012, passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-IV, Bengaluru, in Criminal Appeal No.733/2011.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court is that on 31/7/2010 around 9.55 a.m., this petitioner being the driver of the tipper lorry bearing No.KA- 416217 drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner through Mysore Road and dashed against the motorcycle. As a result, both the rider and the pillion rider of the motorcycle have fell down and the rider of the motorcycle had sustained simple injuries and the pillion rider, who also sustained injuries succumbed to the same, since the lorry ran over the head of the pillion rider.
4. Based on the complaint, the police have registered the case for the offences punishable under Ss. 279, 337 and 304-A of I
The main legal point established is the reliance on consistent witness testimony and documentary evidence to establish the accused's involvement in the offence, leading to the Court's decision to uph....
The case underscores the obligations of drivers to exercise due care and the legal implications of failing to adhere to traffic regulations, leading to serious consequences.
Negligence in motor vehicle operation resulting in death is punishable under IPC, with identification of the driver being critical for conviction.
A conviction under criminal law requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which was lacking in this case, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on prosecution evidence, including witness testimonies and reports, to establish the guilt of the accused under Section 304-A IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of a driver to exercise reasonable care and precaution on public roads, and the prosecution's burden to prove rash and negligent driving i....
The court emphasized the duty of drivers, especially professionals, to maintain utmost care and determined an appropriate deterrent sentence in cases of vehicular negligence resulting in death.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
