IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Mohammad Nawaz, J.
Tejas V – Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1834 of 2023
Decided On : 06-11-2023
Bail - Sexual Offences - The court allowed the appeal and ordered the accused to be enlarged on bail in a case involving allegations of forcible sexual intercourse and refusal to marry the victim, subject to certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The accused appealed for bail in a case involving allegations of forcible sexual intercourse, refusal to marry the victim, and causing abortion.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the relief sought by the appellant could be granted by imposing suitable conditions, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
Issues: The issues involved allegations of forcible sexual intercourse, refusal to marry, and causing abortion, as well as the potential tampering with prosecution witnesses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the victim's willingness to compromise if the appellant was willing to marry as promised, and the completion of investigation and filing of the charge sheet, in granting the bail.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the accused was ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is preferred by the accused praying to release him on bail in Crime No.168/2023 registered at Avalahally Police Station, Bengaluru.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for appellant, learned High Court Government Pleader for the State and respondent No.2/victim who is present before the Court.
3. On a complaint lodged by respondent No.2, Avalahally Police registered Crime No.168/2023 against the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 504, 376, 313 and 417 of IPC. In the complaint, it is averred that the complainant is aged about 24 years and after the demise of her parents, she has been residing in a rented house and working at reliance. She got acquainted with the accused who was also working there and their acquaintance turned into close intimacy. On two to three occasions, the accused took her to his house in the absence of his parents and committed forcible sexual intercourse on her and promised that he will marry her. Thereafter, on the pretext of marriage, on several occasions he committed sexual intercourse and told her not to reveal the incident to others. Further, when she conceived, he got her pregnancy aborted and then changed his mobile number and refused to marry her telling her that she belong to scheduled caste and also abused her in filthy language, threatened her etc.
4. Investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 417, 504 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.
5. The learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has opined that there is a prima facie and reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed the offence of rape and other offences, which are alleged by the victim and there are sufficient materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime showing his prima facie involvement. The bail petition was rejected considering the nature of allegations against the accused and the nature of evidence in support thereof, observing that there is a reasonable apprehension of witnesses being tampered with etc.
6. Learned counsel appearing for appellant would contend that even if the entire allegations are accepted, the ingredients of the offences alleged are not made out. He contends that the victim is a major aged about 24 years and the complaint averments reveal that, she is a consenting party and the allegations that there was forcible sexual intercourse with a promise of marriage etc is false. He submits that the appellant is in judicial custody from 19.08.2023 and he is not required for any further interrogation, as the charge sheet is already filed. He submits that the appellant is ready and willing to abide by any conditions and he will regularly appear before the trial Court. Accordingly, he has sought to allow the appeal.
7. The learned High Court Government Pleader has opposed the prayer contending that there is a prima facie case made out against the appellant/accused for a serious offence and in the event of grant of bail, he may tamper with the prosecution witnesses particularly the victim. Therefore, she seeks to reject the appeal.
8. The victim who is present before the Court submits that she wants to compromise the matter, if the appellant is willing to marry as promised by him.
9. Admittedly, the complainant/victim is a major aged about 24 years. The complaint averments would reveal that the accused and the complainant were working together at the same place and at that time they developed some intimacy. The allegations are that on the pretext of marriage, the accused committed forcible sexual intercourse on several occasions and then refused to marry the complainant stating that she belong to scheduled caste and threatened her etc. It is also alleged that when she became pregnant, the accused gave tablets to her and on consuming those tablets her pregna
The court may grant bail in cases involving serious offences, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances, and by imposing suitable conditions.
The completion of investigation and absence of reasons to detain the appellant are crucial factors in determining entitlement to bail.
The gravity of the offense, evidence of forcible sexual acts, and the victim's age are crucial factors in determining bail applications in cases involving minors and sexual offenses.
The Court allows bail based on the victim's consent and no further requirement for custody during proceedings.
The timing of the sexual act in relation to the marriage is crucial in determining the applicability of certain offences and the grant of bail.
The main legal point established is that bail can be granted under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (PA) Act based on the prosecutrix's allegations, lack of sustained injury, and the need for the appell....
The court considered the victim's conflicting statements, her age, and the circumstances of her marriage in granting bail to the accused, highlighting the importance of evaluating the totality of cir....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.