SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 667

K. NATARAJAN
Siddappa B H – Appellant
Versus
State By Lokayuktha Police – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri Shankar P. Hegde, Advocate, for the Appellant; Sri B.S. Prasad, Special Counsel - Lokayuktha, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. All these petitions are filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for setting aside the orders dated 18.11.2022, 07.12.2022 and 10.01.2023 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (Lokayuktha), Davanagere, in Special (Lokayuktha) Case No.3/2008, for having rejected the applications filed by the petitioner under Sections 91 and 311 of Cr.P.C. respectively.

2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.S Prasad, the learned Special Counsel for respondent-Lokayuktha.

3. Criminal Petition No.2954/2/203 is filed against the order of dismissal dated 18.11.2022 under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for summoning the alleged three reports submitted by the investigation officer for the purpose of getting permission to prosecute the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the investigation officer, who was examined as P.W.79, has filed charge sheet before the Court, but prior to that he has prepared three reports calculating the disproportionate assets against the petitioner and thereafter, filed the charge sheet by showing the higher value of assets and therefore, those documents are necessary for the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top