Back
V SRISHANANDA
K. M. Poornesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
V Srishananda, J. - Heard Sri. K.S. Ganesha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. S. Vishnumurthy, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the records.
2. Present petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
'The petitioner, therefore prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow the petition and enlarge him on bail in Crime No.0091/2022 (C.C.No.2116/2022) of Balehonnur Police Station, Chikkamagaluru District, pending on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Chikkamagaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 307, 504 and 506 of IPC on such terms and conditions as deemed fit in the interest of justice and equity.'
3. Upon the complaint lodged by Gowtham S/o Sathisha @ Halappa, the Balehonnur Police Station, registered a case in Cr.No.91/2022 on 13.08.2022.
4. The gist of the complaint averments reveal that on 12.08.2022 at about 7.30 p.m., when complainant was proceeding towards the grocery shop of Pradeepa and when he was drinking the fruit juice, the accused-petitioner came there and abused the complainant in filthy language and with the help of a broken bottle piece he
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the nature of the injury sustained by the victim and the period of custody of the accused are crucial factors in determining whether bail shou....
The severity of the offense and the prima facie material available on record disentitled the petitioner from obtaining bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
