IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G Uma, J.
Ahamadh Kabeer & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 11972 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2023
Bail - Grant of Bail - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, accused Nos.3 and 5, sought bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed innocence and argued that they were falsely implicated without basis.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allegations were serious, a charge sheet had been filed, and a prima facie case existed against the petitioners. However, considering that the investigation was completed, and other accused were already on bail, the court granted bail to the petitioners with specific conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the seriousness of the allegations, completion of investigation, and the fact that other accused were already on bail as grounds for granting bail to the petitioners.
Final Decision: The petitioners were ordered to be enlarged on bail with specific conditions to ensure their appearance before the court and prevent any potential threats to prosecution witnesses.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
M G Uma, J. - The petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 5 are before this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.43 of 2022 of Yagati Police Station, pending on the file of the learned Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Kadur, Chikkamagaluru, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant Sri.Y S Shashikumar.
2. Heard Sri B S Sachin, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H S Shankar, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent -State. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners is arrayed as accused Nos.3 and 5. They are innocent and have not committed any offences as alleged. They have been falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. They were apprehended on 21.07.2022 and since then they are in judicial custody. The investigation has been completed and the charge sheet is also filed. Accused Nos.1, 2, 4, and 6 against whom similar allegations are made are already enlarged on bail as per the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Hence, on the ground of parity, these petitioners are also entitled to be enlarged on bail. The petitioners are not required for custodial interrogation. Since the investigation is already completed, detention of the petitioners in custody would amount to pre-trial punishment. The petitioners are the permanent residents of the addresses mentioned in the cause title to the petition and are ready and willing to abide by any of the conditions that would be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to allow the petition.
4. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader opposing the petition submitted that serious allegations are made against the petitioners for having committed the offences. After due investigation, charge sheet came to be filed which makes out a strong prima facie case against the petitioners. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of bail. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the petition.
5. In view of the rival contentions urged by the learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would arise for my consideration is:
'Whether the petitioners are entitled for grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.?'
My answer to the above point is in 'Affirmative' for the following:
REASONS
6. The allegations made against the petitioners are of serious nature. After investigation, charge sheet is filed which makes out a prima facie case against the petitioners for having committed the offences. Therefore, at this stage, it cannot be said that the petitioners are falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. Admittedly, the petitioners were apprehended on 21.07.2022 and since then they are judicial custody. It is not the case of the prosecution that the petitioners are required to be detained in custody for any purpose, except to ensure their presence before the Trial Court. It is stated that accused Nos.1, 2, 4 and 6 against whom similar allegations are made are already on bail. Hence, I am of the opinion that the present petitioners are also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Admittedly, the investigation is completed and the charge sheet is also filed. Therefore, detention of the petitioners in custody would amount to infringement of their right to life and liberty. Hence, I am of the opinion that the petitioners are entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to conditions, which will take care of the apprehension expressed by the learned High Court Government Pleader that the petitioners may abscond or may tamper or threaten the prosecution witnesses.
7. Accordingly, I answer the above point in the affirmative and proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed.
The petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.43 of 2022 of Yagati Police S
The court's decision was influenced by the finding that there were sufficient materials to constitute the offence under Sec. 302 of IPC and that the petitioners failed to provide a satisfactory expla....
In cases of heinous offences, delay in trial is not a standalone ground for bail if material witnesses are currently being examined, especially when the accused has not demonstrated a change in circu....
Granting bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Point of law : discretion for grant of bail must be exercised cautiously while considering the bail petitions of the nature being dealt with.
The detention of the petitioner in custody till the conclusion of trial would amount to infringement of his right and life of liberty, leading to the grant of bail with specific conditions.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the trial is expected to be lengthy and the offences are triable by a magistrate, highlighting the importance of the righ....
A court can grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by considering the duration of judicial custody and potential trial delays, without addressing case merits.
The court considered the absence of criminal history apart from the case shown in the gang chart and the undertaking of the applicant not to misuse the liberty of bail as grounds for allowing the bai....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.