Back
M. G. UMA
Nagesha M. V – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 are before this Court seeking grant of bail under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.12/2022 of Hosahalli Police Station, pending on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural district, Doddaballapura, initially registered for the offences punishable under Ss. 504, 143, 147, 148, 149, 114, 323, 324, 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and the charge sheet is filed for the offences punishable under Ss. 143, 147, 148, 504, 323, 324, 307, 149 of the IPC, on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant Mr.Muniraju
2. Heard Sri. Subramanya H.V, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Krishna Kumar K.K, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2. They are innocent and have not committed any offence as alleged. They have been falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. They were apprehended on 9/5/2022 and since then they are in judicial custody. Learned Counsel for the petitioners further submitted that initially the c
The court's decision was influenced by the finding that there were sufficient materials to constitute the offence under Sec. 302 of IPC and that the petitioners failed to provide a satisfactory expla....
The completion of investigation and the existence of a prima facie case were key factors in granting bail to the petitioners.
Bail is permissible even if preventive detention is in force if facts merit grant of relief.
There is considerable progress in the investigation. So, in the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are entitled to be enlarged on bail on certain conditions.
The specific overt-act allegation, role of the accused, and medical evidence are pivotal in deciding bail petitions for serious offences.
The court considered the progress in the investigation, the discharge of the injured from the hospital, and the examination of material witnesses as grounds for granting bail to the petitioners.
Bail may be granted even in serious offences if the accused's fair trial rights are violated, and no compelling reason for continued incarceration exists.
The court reaffirmed that the presumption of innocence and the right to bail are fundamental, particularly when evidence is insufficient to justify continued detention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
