SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 782

KRISHNA S.DIXIT
R. Padma – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.V. Giridhar, Advocate, Sridhar Hegde, Advocate, Pushpakantha, Advocate, R. Hemanth Raj, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Petitioners are knocking at the doors of Writ Court seeking quashment of two orders both dtd. 21/9/2015 passed by the 2nd Respondent - Karnataka Housing Board whereby they were asked to make payment of 'Guidance Value', if they wanted reconveyance of scheduled lands in their favour. Both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that in similar matters Respondent - Housing Board, has reconvyed the lands to other land owners after getting the sale price back with some interest and therefore, their clients cannot be discriminated against as if they are the children of the stepmother. So contending, they seek indulgence of the Writ Court.

2. Learned AGA appearing on behalf of Respondent - State and the learned panel counsel appearing for the Housing Board opposed the Petitions making submission in justification of the impugned orders. They contend that admittedly the Petitioners having sold their properties and having received the agreed price, they cannot now seek reconveyance in the absence of a condition of enablement in the Conveyances or the law giving such a right. Learned AGA adds that, in matters like this there is no justiciable right which arg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top