JUDGMENT

1. Revision Petitioner/accused feeling aggrieved by the judgment of First Appellate Court on the file of III Fast Tract Court, Bengaluru Rural District in Criminal Appeal No.77/2012 dtd. 30/8/2014 confirming the judgment of Trial Court on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate in Criminal Case No.548/2009 dtd. 25/8/2012 preferred this revision petition.

2. Parties to the Revision Petition are referred with their ranks as assigned in the Trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. Heard the arguments of both sides.

4. After hearing the arguments of both sides and on perusal of the Trial Court records, including the judgment of both the courts below, the following point arise for consideration:

"Whether the impugned judgment under Revision Petition is perverse, capricious and legally not sustainable and call for any interference by this Court?"

5. On careful perusal of oral and documentary evidence placed on record by complainant, it would go to show that accused being the friend of complainant approached for hand loan of Rs.1, 50, 000.00. Complainant has paid an amount of Rs.1, 50, 000.00 in cash in the month of June, 2008. Accused, in order to discharge the said legally enfo