SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1253

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT KALABURAGI BENCH
Mohammad Nawaz, Rajesh Rai K, JJ.
Smt. Lakshmi @ Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Election Commission & Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 200115 of 2023
Decided On : 11-10-2023

Advocates appeared:
Smt. Ratna N. Shivayogimath, Advocate, for the Appellant; Sri Amaresh S. Roja, Advocate for R1; Sri C.Jagadish, Advocate for R2 and R3; Sri Mahadev S. Patil, Advocate for C/R-4, for the Respondent.

A candidate's eligibility to contest in elections must align with the reservation categories at the time of nomination, and subsequent changes in caste status do not retroactively validate an election.

Headnote:

ELECTION LAW - GRAM PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS - KARNATAKA GRAM PANCHAYAT ACT, 1993; CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ART. 243; KARNATAKA CASTE CERTIFICATE ACT, 2011 - The court discussed the provisions of the Karnataka Gram Panchayat Act, 1993, which governs the elections and reservations for various categories in local bodies. It emphasized the constitutional principles regarding reservations under Article 243 of the Constitution of India. The court interpreted the eligibility criteria for contesting elections based on caste certificates, highlighting that the appellant's election was invalid as she contested from a reserved seat for Backward Class-A while claiming to belong to a Scheduled Tribe only after the election notification. The court's decision was influenced by the need to uphold the integrity of the electoral process and the importance of accurate representation of caste in elections.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant contested and was elected as the Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat, Sonna, after claiming to belong to the Talawar caste, which she asserted was a Scheduled Tribe. However, she had previously contested from a seat reserved for Backward Class-A, leading to questions about her eligibility.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant's election was null and void as she contested from a reserved seat for BC-A while later claiming to belong to an ST category. The court noted that the caste certificate issued after the election did not retroactively validate her candidacy.

Issues: Whether the appellant was eligible to contest for the post of Adhyaksha reserved for ST-Woman given her prior declaration of belonging to a different caste and contesting from a reserved seat for BC-A.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a candidate must meet the eligibility criteria as per the reservation norms at the time of contesting the election. The issuance of a caste certificate post-election does not validate a prior ineligibility based on incorrect caste representation.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's decision that the appellant's election was invalid. However, the direction for criminal action against the appellant was set aside pending verification of the caste certificate's validity.

JUDGMENT

1. In this appeal, the appellant has assailed the order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.202197/2023.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. The undisputed facts are that, the appellant was elected as member of Gram Panchayat, Sonna - 16, Taluk Jewargi, District Kalaburagi in the elections conducted to the constituency of Ward No.1, as per election certificate dated 30.12.2020. After completion of the term of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha, as per order dated 04.07.2023 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Kalaburagi, meeting was scheduled for conducting the election to the said post for the second term and the election was fixed on 03.08.2023. The post of Adhyaksha was reserved for ST-Woman candidate and the post of Upadhyaksha was reserved for Backward Class-A ('BC-A' for short).

4. The appellant, aspiring for the post of Adhyaksha, filed an application to the competent authority to issue the caste certificate, claiming that she belong to Talawar caste, coming under Scheduled Tribe category ('ST' for short). The Tahasildar issued an endorsement dated 18.07.2023 refusing to issue the caste certificate.

The said endorsement (Annexure-G) was challenged in the aforementioned writ petition. The appellant sought for an interim order, to permit her to contest the election for Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat, Sonna, scheduled on 03.08.2023.

5. The learned Single Judge, by way of an interim order, passed on 02.08.2023, directed the respondents to permit the appellant herein to contest the election, in terms of calendar of events dated 03.08.2023, subject to the result of the writ petition. Accordingly, the appellant contested the election and got elected as President of Gram Panchayat, Sonna.

6. During the pendency of the writ petition, respondent No.3 issued the caste certificate to the appellant on 08.08.2023, stating that the appellant belongs to Talawar community, which is included under ST category. Respondent No.4 got impleaded in the writ petition and contended that the appellant herein was elected from Ward No.1, which was reserved for BC-A, declaring that she belongs to Kabbaliga caste, whereas respondent No.4 contested the election from Ward No.2 reserved for ST-Woman and got elected and she being the only candidate belonging to ST -Woman, is entitled to be elected as Adhyaksha, which post was reserved for ST-Woman.

7. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition observing that the appellant herein was elected as Member of Sonna Gram Panchayat, under other Backward Class Category-A and therefore, she cannot get the benefit of calendar of events wherein the post of Adhyaksha was reserved for Scheduled Tribe (Woman) Category. The learned Single Judge has come to the conclusion that the election of the appellant to the post of Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat is null and void and against the constitutional principles and further observed that it is open for the respondents to issue new calendar of events to elect the Adhyaksha of Sonna Gram Panchayat, at the earliest, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.

8. The learned Single Judge has also observed that the Deputy Commissioner of Kalaburagi shall initiate criminal action against the appellant and the respondent authorities were directed to take appropriate action against her and disqualify her membership of the Gram Panchayat, in accordance with law.

9. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant belongs to Talawar ST Caste, as it is found in the school records and the Headmaster, Government High School, Aurad, Taluk Jewargi, District Kalaburagi has issued the school certificate dated 26.06.2023, which shows that she belongs to Hindu Talawar caste. Further, the caste certificate of the brother of the appellant also discloses that he belongs to Talawar Caste which comes under Sche

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top