IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S. Vishwajith Shetty, J.
Chandrappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka By Sho, Gudibande Police Station Chickballapura & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No.3408 of 2024
Decided On : 25-04-2024
QUASHING OF FIR - CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS - IPC 376(2)(n), POCSO Act 5(J)(II), 5(L), 6, Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 9, 10 - The court discussed the non-compoundable nature of the offences under the IPC and POCSO Act but emphasized the inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when parties have amicably settled their disputes. The court highlighted the importance of considering the welfare of the victim and the nature of the relationship between the parties, ultimately deciding that the continuation of the case was not in the interest of justice.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was charged with serious offences under the IPC and POCSO Act, but the parties, who were in a romantic relationship, got married and sought to quash the FIR after amicably settling their dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim was a major and competent to compound the offences. It acknowledged the marriage and the couple's desire to lead a normal family life, thus justifying the quashing of the FIR.
Issues: Whether the court can quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences when the parties have settled their dispute and the victim has no objection to quashing the FIR.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on precedents establishing that inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be exercised to quash FIRs in cases where the continuation of proceedings is not in the interest of justice, even for non-compoundable offences, especially when the parties are married and have children.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the entire proceedings in Crime No.49/2024 were quashed.
ORDER
S. Vishwajith Shetty, J.
Accused in Crime No.49/2024 registered by Gudibande police station, Chickballapura for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 5(J)(II), 5(L) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 2016, is before this Court to quash the entire proceedings in the said case.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. The petitioner and the victim were in love. It is only when the victim had gone to the Primary Health Centre, Madhugiri for the purpose of delivery, after verification of her age, a complaint was lodged by the respondent No.2. They submit that the victim girl was a major as on the date of registration of the FIR and subsequently, the marriage of the petitioner with the victim girl has been solemnized and the same is also registered before the jurisdictional Registrar of Marriages. They submit that the certificate of registration of marriage dated 01.04.2024 is also produced along with this petition. They also submit that the parties intend to give a quietus to the dispute between them and they intend to lead a normal family life. Therefore, they have filed an application before this Court under Section 482 read with Section 320 of Cr.P.C. seeking permission to compound the offences. They submit that they have also filed an affidavit in support of the prayer made in the application to compound the offences for which FIR has been registered against the petitioner.
3. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that the FIR has been registered against the petitioner for non-compoundable offences.
4. The application filed by the parties under Section 482 read with Section 320 of Cr.P.C. is taken on record. The parties who are present before the Court are identified by their respective advocates.
5. In paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, it is stated as follows:
3. It is submitted that offence under section 5(J)(II), 5(L)(6) of POCSO Act and under section 10, 9 of The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Karnataka Amendment) Act 2016, and section 376(2)(n) of IPC are non-compoundable in nature but inview of facts and circumstance of the case since the petitioner and the victim/respondent no.3 are husband and wife and they married on 01/12/2023 in anjaneyaswami temple, Aroor village, Chickabalapur Taluk and their marriage is registered with registrar of marriage on 01/04/2024 and living with child and respondent no.3 has no objection for quashing the entire proceedings against the Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to permit the parties to compound the offence alleged against the Petitioner and quash the F.I.R. against the petitioner in Crime No.49/2024 of Gudibande Police Station, for the offences under section 5(J)(II), 5(L)(6) of POCSO Act and under section 10, 9 of The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Karnataka Amen
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303
Parbatbhai Aahir vs. State of Gujarat reported in (2017) 9 SCC 641
The court affirmed that inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences when the parties have settled their disputes, particularly in cases inv....
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offense proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. when parties settle amicably, ensuring justice without adhering strictly to compoundability rules.
Inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. allow quashing of proceedings for non-compoundable offences if the parties have amicably settled and it serves the interest of justice.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. if there's a voluntary settlement, particularly in private disputes, ensuring justice for all parties involved.
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash non-compoundable offences when continuation causes undue hardship and mutual affection exists between parties, underscoring the need for justice.
The High Court can quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. even for non-compoundable offences if justice demands it and the parties have reached a suitable settlement.
Ends of justice are higher than ends of mere law though justice has got to be administered in accordance with laws enacted by Legislature.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.