IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
Channabasappa S/o Sangappa Giriyal - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 102576 of 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
Decided On : 22-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. presence of non-compoundable offences in a petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. settlement between parties mitigating hardship. (Para 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. details of the application and marriage of parties. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. supreme court guidance on inherent powers under section 482. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. outcome of quashing proceedings in interest of justice. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
1. Accused Nos.1 to 5 are before this Court under Section 4 82 of Cr.P.C., with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in Special Case No.41 of 2025 pending before the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC- I, Belagavi, arising out of Crime No.238/2024 registered by Kittur Police Station, Belagavi district for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(n) read with Section 34 of IPC, Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 9 , 10 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 who is the grandfather of the victim girl, jointly submit that dispute between the parties has been amicably settled at the intervention of elders and well-wishers of both parties. Accused No.1 and victim girl are married and they have a child from their wedlock. Pendency of the criminal case is causing serious hardship to the victim and her family members and also to the accused persons and they are not in a position to lead a normal life because of the pendency of the impugned proceedings. They have therefore decided to give quietus to the entire dispute. They submit that parties have filed application before this Court under Section 359 read with Section 528 of BNSS 2023 seeking permission of this Court to compound the alleged offences and consequently to quash the impugned proceedings.
4. Learned HCGP however brings to the notice of this Court that charge sheet has been filed for non compoundable offences.
5. The application filed by the petitioners under Section 359 read with Section 528 of BNSS 2023, is signed by the petitioners as well as by the victim girl. The said application is also signed by the advocate appearing for the petitioners. Application is supported by the affidavit of the victim girl who is aged 19 years. The petitioners, the victim and her grandfather are present before the Court. The parties who are present before the Court are identified by their respective advocates. The application filed under Section 359 read with 528 of the BNSS 2023, which is supported by the affidavit of the victim girl, is taken on record.
6. In paragraph Nos.3 to 8 of the said application, it is stated as follows:
“3. That the alleged incident is of 05/01/2024 and the complainant lodged a complaint before the Kittur P.S. registered in FIR Crime No.238/2024 dated 14/12/2024 for the offence punishable U/s 376(2)(n) R/w 34 of IPC section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act 2012 and section 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
4. It is submitted that the Investigation Officer has completed investigation and filed Charge sheet for the offences punishable U/s 376(2)(n) R/w 34 of IPC section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act 2012 and section 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and the trial court has taken cognizance for the offences punishable U/s 376(2)(n) R/w 34 of IPC section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act 2012 and section 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
5. It is submitted that, the petitioner No.1 is the husband, petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law, petitioner No.3 is the mother-in-law, petitioner No.4 is the father of the alleged victim and petitioner No.5 is the mother of the alleged victim.
6. It is submitted that, on going through the Birth Certificate of the victim the date of birth is mentioned as 16/01/2006 which has been issued by the Tahsildar, Bailhongal and as on the date of marriage she was 17 years 11 months 19 days.
7. That the marriage of victim and the petitioner No.1 h
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offense proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. when parties settle amicably, ensuring justice without adhering strictly to compoundability rules.
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash non-compoundable offences when continuation causes undue hardship and mutual affection exists between parties, underscoring the need for justice.
The High Court can quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. even for non-compoundable offences if justice demands it and the parties have reached a suitable settlement.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. if there's a voluntary settlement, particularly in private disputes, ensuring justice for all parties involved.
The court can quash non-compoundable criminal proceedings in light of a mutual settlement and marriage between the parties, focusing on justice and personal circumstances.
Inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. allow quashing of proceedings for non-compoundable offences if the parties have amicably settled and it serves the interest of justice.
The court can quash proceedings under the POCSO Act based on genuine settlements, especially when the accused and victim are married, to prevent injustice and promote family harmony.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. even if the offences are non-compoundable, especially when the parties have amicably ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.