HU XIAOLIN W/O ANAS AHMED vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Kar) 467

M. NAGAPRASANNA
HU XIAOLIN W/O ANAS AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SUHAIB FAZEEL M.
For the Respondents: HARISH GANAPATHI, H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 04-09-2023 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in Crime No. 8 of 2021, whereby the concerned Court denies travel to the petitioner in modification of bail conditions.

2. Heard Sri Suhaib Fazeel Madar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Harish Ganapathi, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No. 1 and Sri H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for respondent No. 3.

3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:

The petitioner, a lady, is a Chinese national. She comes to India in the year 2017 and is married to one Anas Ahmed, an Indian national currently residing in Bangalore. On certain allegations, a complaint comes to be registered by the 2nd respondent, a payment gateway, Razorpay Software Private Limited against the husband of the petitioner which becomes a crime in Crime No. 8 of 2021 for offences punishable under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (‘the Act’ for short). The crime is registered by the Cyber Crime Police. In connection with registration of crim