SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 122

R. K. PATTANAIK
Akash Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate, Sidharth Shankar Mohapatra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.K. Pattanaik, J. - Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is at the behest of the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 13th April, 2022 passed in C.T. Case No.4053 of 2020 by the learned J.M.F.C., Bhubaneswar whereby an application filed by him seeking permission to leave the jurisdiction of the Court and to travel to Pune and Delhi was declined and rejected.

2. An FIR was lodged by the informant, namely, DGM (Ethics) of Tata Motor Ltd. before the CID(CB), Bhubaneswar, consequent upon which, CID Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.26 of 2020 was registered under Section 420 IPC and other allied offences was registered which corresponds to C.T. Case No.4053 of 2001. The chargesheet against the petitioner and others was finally submitted in the year 2022 under the alleged offences. The petitioner, who was in judicial custody, was released on bail by this Court's order dated 16th February, 2022 in BLAPL No.6494 of 2021. Thereafter, the petitioner moved the application before the learned State which was however denied vide Annexure-5. Aggrieved by such rejection, the petitioner has approached this Court challenging the correctness and judicial prosperity of the impugned orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top