SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Shany Jose, Daughter Of Joy Cherian - Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India, Ministry Of External Affairs, Represented Herein By Its Secretary and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.8969 OF 2024 (GM-PASS)
Decided On : 04-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. S. Sushant Venkatesh Pai, Adv.
For the Respondents: Sri. H. Shanthi Bhushan, DSGI.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that individuals affected by travel restrictions can seek relief through representations, emphasizing the need for compassionate consideration in enforcing national security measures.

Headnote:

Passport - Seizure of Passport - Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 6, 10, 12, 19 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Passports Act, particularly the powers of the Central Government to issue notifications restricting travel to certain countries, and emphasized the need for individual representations for passport release in light of the notification.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a nurse, had her passport seized upon returning to India from Yemen due to a government notification prohibiting travel to Yemen. She sought a writ of mandamus for its release.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while the notification was valid for national security, the petitioner should be allowed to submit a representation for the release of her passport, considering her circumstances.

Issues: Whether the respondents should be directed to hand over the passport to the petitioner despite the seizure under the government notification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the notification's provisions must be interpreted in a manner that allows individuals to seek redress through representations, balancing national security with individual rights.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of, allowing the petitioner to submit a representation for the release of her passport.

ORDER :

(M. Nagaprasanna, J.)

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to release passport of the petitioner issued on 30-09-2019 which is presently seized and withheld by the respondents in terms of the seizure memo dated 20-08-2023.

2. Heard Sri S.Sushant Venkatesh Pai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for the respondents.

3. The facts, in brief, germane are s follows:-

The petitioner who has a Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery is a qualified Nurse by avocation. The petitioner in search of a job is shown a job opportunity in Yemen at Al-Noor Hospital Aibb city as a staff nurse. She joins the said Hospital at Yemen in February 2011; works there for about 9 years; secures another job at Kara General Hospital, Marib again in Yemen. She works there up to July 2022 and later secures a better job as a Nurse at Shabwa General Hospital again at Yemen. The petitioner has been residing at Yemen for the aforesaid work and would used to visit India intermittently. The petitioner is said to have visited India on two occasions viz., in the months of April, 2014 and December, 2020. During her stay in Yemen passport that she had in her possession was to expire and accordingly she approaches the Indian Embassy at Yemen which issues fresh passport to the petitioner with a validity of 10 years till 29-09-2029.

4. The father of the petitioner is said to have fallen seriously ill and was diagnosed with stomach cancer. For the said reason, she travelled back to India from Yemen on 19-08-2023 and lands at International Airport at Delhi to visit her father. The Immigration Authorities seized her passport on landing on the ground that her travel itself was in violation of the Notification issued by Government of India which prohibits Indian citizens travelling from Yemen. It is the seizure of the passport in terms of the Notification that has driven the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the petitioner is a Nurse. She does not know issuance of a notification or otherwise. It is not for the first time that she travels to India and back to Yemen. She had done so twice. No Immigration Authorities have stopped the petitioner from travelling from Yemen. It is only now in 2023, for the first time, alleging that it is in violation of the Notification the passport is seized. After the seizure of the passport a show cause notice is issued seeking the petitioner to explain why she travelled to Yemen. The petitioner has also submitted her written response to the show cause notice. Since the passport is not de-seized, the petitioner is before this Court.

6. Per contra, the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India would vehemently oppose the petition to contend that the passport of the petitioner cannot be handed over to her as there is express bar under the Notification that one who travels to Yemen contrary to the Notification would face seizure of the passport for a period of seven years and, therefore, the passport cannot be returned. He would further contend that instead of approaching this Court, a representation should have been given to the Passport Authorities and the Passport Authorities would have taken an appropriate action in accordance with law. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India would contend that contrary to the Notification, the Government of India cannot be directed to release the passport of the petitioner.

7. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner cannot alone be blamed for the action. She was never stopped by any Immigration Authorities. The seizure of the passport for seven years now will take away her chances of employment anywhere in the globe. She being a Nurse should not be made to suffer for the ignorance of law or ignorance of the Authorities in implementing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top