IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
SHANKAR NAIK G.K. S/O SRI KRISHNA NAIK – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 26231 of 2023
Decided On : 09-08-2024
Corruption - Police Misconduct - IPC Sections 409, 465, 201, 110; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 - The court examined the applicability of IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act provisions, emphasizing the need for investigation due to prima facie evidence of misconduct and tampering with seized property.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Police Inspector, was accused of misconduct related to the handling of Rs. 72 lakhs seized in a theft case. Allegations included failure to deposit the amount to the Treasury and tampering with the seized currency denominations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had not deposited the seized amount and had kept it in his custody for an extended period, which raised serious questions about his conduct and warranted further investigation.
Issues: Whether the allegations against the petitioner under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act were substantiated enough to warrant an investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prima facie evidence of misconduct and the discrepancies in the handling of seized property justified the continuation of the investigation.
Result: The Writ Petition is rejected.
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question crime in Crime No. 454 of 2023 registered for offences punishable under Sections 409, 465, 201, 110 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘the Act’ for short) pending before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City.
2. Facts, in brief, adumbrated are as follows:
3. When things stood thus, the petitioner on 27-01-2023 was transferred out of Byatarayanapura Police Station and posted as Police Inspector, Anekal Police Station. On 27-02-2023, after the transfer of the petitioner, the learned Magistrate directed the 1st respondent Police to deliver the seized amount of Rs. 72/- lakhs to the custody of the officials of the Income-Tax Department. It is here the role of the petitioner surfaced. On 26-02-2023, the previous day of the said order, the petitioner carries a bag to Byatarayanapura Police Station which allegedly contained Rs. 72/- lakhs and placed the same in the Police Station. After the said money being kept in the Police Station, the officials of the Income- Tax Department visit Byatarayanapura Police Station and in the presence of the then Police Inspector and the panchas opened the bag and found Rs. 72/- lakhs consisting of various denominations of currency notes of Rs. 100/-, Rs. 200/-, Rs. 500/- and Rs. 2000/- which also consisted of two bundles which did bear State Bank of India Branch seal and covering.
4. Later, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Administration), Bengaluru in terms of his order dated 17-06-2023 appoints Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chickpet Sub-Division to conduct a preliminary enquiry as to why the amount was carried into the Police Station. Preliminary enquiry was conducted, petitioner was questioned and the report of the inquiry goes in favour of the petitioner, as the allegations were held to be not proved. Long after the conduct of preliminary enquiry and report being submitted by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, a crime comes to be registered in Crime No. 454 of 2023 i.e., on 22-11-2023, by the 2nd respondent/Assistant Commissioner of Police, a different Assistant Commissioner of Police than the one who had conducted the preliminary enquiry earlier. It was for the afore-quoted offences. The allegation in the complaint was that the petitioner had kept with him entire Rs. 72/- lakhs notwithstanding PF being drawn on it and did not deposit it to the State Treasury inter alia. The moment crime is registered, the petitioner knocks at the doors of this Court in the subject petition. A coordinate Bench of this Court, on 24-11-2023, stayed further investigation against the petitioner. The said interim order of stay is operating even today.
5. Heard Sri P. Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri B.A. Belliappa, learned State Public Prosecutor-I for the respondents.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the crime is registered for offences punishable under Section 7 of the Act and Sections 409, 465, 20
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Kaptan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
The court established that prima facie evidence of police misconduct necessitates further investigation under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The court dismissed the petition to quash criminal proceedings, affirming that prima facie evidence of misconduct and negligence under relevant statutes was established.
The absence of evidence proving demand for illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act led to the quashing of criminal proceedings against the petitioner.
The court established that prima facie evidence of a bribe demand is sufficient to justify an investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and that quashing an FIR should be an exception rat....
The court clarified that the need for sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is to be determined during trial, not at the quashment stage.
The court emphasized that it would be unjust, unfair, and oppressive to allow the findings in the departmental proceedings to stand when the case against the petitioner could not be established in a ....
Point of Law : Power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings, High Court would have to proceed entirely on basis of allegations made in complaint or documents accompanying same per se....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.