Back
H. P. SANDESH
Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited, Represented By Its Authorised Signatory Mr. Maurice Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Hotel Grand Centre Point, A. Partnership Registered Under The Partnership Act, Represented By Its Partner – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(H.P. Sandesh, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the caveator/respondent No.2.
2. This miscellaneous first appeal is filed challenging the order of the Trial Court dated 01.10.2024 dismissing I.A.Nos.5 to 7 in AA No.4/2024 which have been filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC and Section 9 of the Arbitration Act read with Rule 9 of the Arbitration (Proceedings Before the Courts) Rules, 2001. I.A.No.5 was filed praying to grant an order of temporary injunction restraining respondent No.2, his representatives, successors in interest and anyone claiming under through him from obstructing or impeding the smooth functioning and operations of the hotel premises/schedule property in any manner, pending disposals of the suit.
3. I.A.No.6 was also filed under the very same provision of law seeking the relief of temporary injunction restraining respondent No.2, his representatives, successors in interest and anyone claiming under through him from interfering, obstructing and/or in any manner impeding, either directly or indirectly with the management and operations of the hotel premises/schedule property in any man
The court ruled that failure to initiate arbitration proceedings within 90 days of an interim order vacates such order, impacting the validity of injunction applications.
Automatic vacation of ad-interim injunction – Where an interim order has been granted on application made under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 but no arbitral proceedings are ini....
An Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot grant interim orders that effectively render final decisions on substantive claims, as this exceeds its jurisdiction.
Point of law: Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal - Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 9(1) of the Act, pending adjudication before this Court prior to constitution of ....
The enforceability of a negative covenant in a Franchise Agreement is determined by the nature of the shared sensitive and confidential information, and the court emphasized the prima facie nature of....
The court emphasized the arbitrability of certain disputes and the grant of injunctions based on a prima facie case of unauthorized trademark use.
The words 'Arbitral Tribunal' in Section 9(3) of Act have to take colour from all said provisions and thus have to be interpreted as Arbitral Tribunal constituted to adjudicate disputes which have ar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
