SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1309

ALOK ARADHE, ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
B Radha – Appellant
Versus
Mallesh Kanna K S – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Smt.S.Radha Pyari For Dr S V Joga Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Sri.V.Vinod Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Mr Alok Aradhe, J. - Smt. S.Radna Pyari, learned counsel appearing for the appellant on behalf of Dr. S.V.Joga Rao and Sri. V.Vinod Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This appeal under section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 has been filed by the wife being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2016 passed by the Family Court, Mysuru, by which petition filed by the husband under Section 13(l)(ia) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 has been allowed and the marriage performed between the parties has been dissolved by a decree of divorce.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that this appeal was filed beyond a period of limitation prescribed under the FAMILY COURTS ACT . It is also not in dispute that after the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2016, the respondent who is employed as an Assistant Grade-3 in Centra! Institute of Plastic Engineering Technology has remarried.

4. In view of the aforesaid subsequent development, learned counsel for the appellant submits that she confines her claim in this appeal only to grant of alimony. It is further pointed out that a Bench of this Court by an interim order dated 18.06.2021 h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top