SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1672

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, JJ.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX – Appellant 
Versus
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX – Respondent 
F.C.A. No. 85 of 2015
Decided On : 11-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S SHARAT KUMAR
For the Respondent: T SURYA SATISH

Post-divorce, a husband's obligation to maintain his wife and child continues, reflecting their financial capacity and duty under law.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)(ia), (ib) - Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Section 25 - Enhancement of maintenance - Marriage dissolved in 2006; maintenance awarded to wife and son - Appellant contested the enhancement of maintenance payments determined by Family Court based on income evidence presented - Court emphasized duty to maintain spouse and child, considering earning capacity of appellant. (Paras 2, 4, 12, 13)

(B) Maintenance - Statutory obligation - The obligation of the husband to maintain his wife and son persists post-divorce, specifically when financial capability allows. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appellant and respondent were married and had a son; disputes arose leading to divorce in 2006. Following the divorce, the respondents filed for maintenance, initially awarded amounts were contested by the appellant, leading to an enhancement in 2013.

Findings of Court:
Court found the maintenance enhancement justified based on the appellant's proven income, upholding the Family Court's reasoned decision for monthly payments of Rs.5,000/- and Rs.4,000/- respectively.

Issues: Primary issues addressed were the appellant's financial capacity and the legal obligation to provide maintenance to the respondents post-divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that it is the duty of a husband to support his wife and child, and that maintenance must reflect the financial capacity of the paying spouse, thereby justifying the enhanced amounts awarded.

Result: Family Court Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. conclusion of dismissal of appeal with directives. (Para 1 , 16)
2. facts regarding marriage dissolution and maintenance proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments concerning the appellant's income and maintenance claims. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court’s assessment of maintenance entitlement and reasoned order. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13)
5. ratios concerning the appellant's obligations and time for arrears payment. (Para 11 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.Ram Mohan Rao, learned counsel representing Mr. S.Sharath Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel representing Mr. T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The marriage of the appellant with respondent No.1 was performed on 20.02.1995 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is an arranged marriage. They were blessed with a son on 17.05.1998 i.e., respondent No.2. Thereafter, disputes arose between them. Appellant had filed an application under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 vide F.C.O.P.No.487 of 2005 against respondent No.1 seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. Vide order dated 07.11.2006, learned the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, allowed the said O.P. and dissolved the marriage of the appellant with respondent No.1. Perusal of the record would reveal that respondent No.1 did not prefer any appeal and it has attained finality.

3. Respondents have filed a suit in O.S.No.19 of 2000 against the appellant herein under Section 26 read with Section 7 and Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking maintenance. Vide order dated 15.04.2002, learned Family Court allowed the said application in-part and awarded an amount of Rs.1,200/- per month to respondent No.1 and Rs.1,000/- per month to respondent No.2 towards maintenance.

4. Respondents filed an application under Section 25 of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 vide F.C.O.P. No.46 of 2012 against the appellant seeking enhancement of maintenance awarded by the learned Family Court vide order dated 15.04.2002 in O.S.No.19 of 2000. Vide order dated 01.11.2013, learned Family Court allowed the said O.P. in-part and enhanced the maintenance of respondent No.1 to Rs.5,000/- per month and respondent No.2 to Rs.4,000/- per month, payable from the date of the said order. Learned Family Court also directed the appellant to deposit the said monthly maintenance on or before 10th day of every month in the bank account of respondent No.1 and she has to furnish the details of the same within one week from the date of the said order. Challenging the said order, appellant-husband preferred the present appeal.

5. Vide order dated 25.03.2015, this Court granted interim suspension of the said order on condition of the appellant depositing Rs.6,000/- per month towards maintenance of respondents. This Court also granted three months time to pay the arrears and he shall continue to deposit the current maintenance amount on or before 10th day of each calendar month.

6. Respondents filed the said O.P. seeking enhancement of maintenance contending that appellant is working as Sub-Inspector in Central Reserve Police Force and he is earning an amount of Rs.40,000/- per month towards salary. However, appellant disproved the same. Appellant contended that after dissolution of the said marriage in compliance with the order dated 07.11.2006 in FCOP No.487 of 2005 passed by the learned Family Court, he got married and staying with his wife. His gross salary at that point of time was only Rs.37,255/- and net salary was Rs.15,772/-.

7. In proof of her claim, respondent No.1 examined herself as PW.1 and filed Ex.A1 - certified copy of judgment dated 15.04.2002 in O.S.No.19 of 2000 and Ex.A2 - bunch of school fee receipts of respondent No.2. To disprove the said claim, appellant examined himself as RW.1 and filed Ex.B1 - second marriage certificate of the appellant, Ex.B2 -

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top