SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1376

ASHOK S. KINAGI
Somashekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Abubacker Shafi, Mohan Kumari B.V.
For the Respondent: Mahantesh Shettar

JUDGMENT :

Ashok S. Kinagi, J.

1. This second appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 09.01.2013, passed in R.A.No. 137/2007 by the Senior Civil Judge, Hunsur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2007, passed in O.S.No. 20/2003 by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Hunsur.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court. The appellant is the plaintiff and respondents are the defendants.

3. The brief facts leading rise to filing of this appeal are as under:

    Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff is the absolute owner in possession of the suit schedule property bearing Sy.No. 13 measuring 2 acres situated in Hanchya Village, Kasaba Hobli, Hunsur Taluk. It is contended that the land bearing Sy.No. 13 measuring 4 acres was granted to one Siddalingaiah by Deputy Commissioner, Mysore on 09.04.1965. Since then, the said Siddalingaiah was in possession and enjoyment of the said property as the absolute owner. On 10.08.1983, the said Siddalingaiah executed a Will in favour of one K. Devappa i.e., the brother of plaintiff, b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top