SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B.M. Shyam Prasad, J.
Anandkumar Ramdeo Singh – Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner (Appeals-I) and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4625 of 2023
Decided On : 06-04-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shervil Adappa
For the Respondent: Jeevan J. Neeralagi

Headnote:(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 29 - Cancellation of GST registration - Petitioner impugned the order for cancellation of GST registration based on an appeal disposed of on grounds of limitation, with a notification issued for revocation procedures available to the petitioner if criteria met - The cancellation decision is contingent upon whether the revocation application is submitted as per the new procedural guidelines. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Court may review administrative decisions affecting GST registration - The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the available remedies under the current notification guidelines. (Para 2)

Table of Content
1. cancellation of gst registration and appeal rights (Para 1)
2. petitioner's right to pursue remedy (Para 2)

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has impugned the second respondent's order dated 11.07.2022 for cancellation of the GST registration under the provisions of Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, the 'COST Act]. The petitioner's subsequent appeal under Section 112 of the CGST Act before the first respondent is disposed of on the ground of limitation. The petitioner has not filed any application for revocation of the cancellation. Presently, the notification dated 31.03.2023 is issued providing for revocation of cancellation of the registration. If the cancellation is under the provisions of Section 29 (2) (b) or (c) of the CGST Act and such cancellation is before 31.12.2022, and an application for revocation is not filed, it is submitted that in terms of this notification the petitioner will be entitled to file an application according to the special procedure now notified.

2. Hence, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy subject to all just exceptions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top