SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1400

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Anandkumar Ramdeo Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner (Appeals-I) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shervil Adappa
For the Respondent: Jeevan J. Neeralagi

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has impugned the second respondent's order dated 11.07.2022 for cancellation of the GST registration under the provisions of Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, the 'COST Act]. The petitioner's subsequent appeal under Section 112 of the CGST Act before the first respondent is disposed of on the ground of limitation. The petitioner has not filed any application for revocation of the cancellation. Presently, the notification dated 31.03.2023 is issued providing for revocation of cancellation of the registration. If the cancellation is under the provisions of Section 29 (2) (b) or (c) of the CGST Act and such cancellation is before 31.12.2022, and an application for revocation is not filed, it is submitted that in terms of this notification the petitioner will be entitled to file an application according to the special procedure now notified.

2. Hence, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy subject to all just exceptions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top