SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1959

ALOK MATHUR
Aryavart Agencies – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anit Vishal Srivastav, Devendra Kumar Singh, Ramesh Chandra Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Alok Mathur, J.

The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14.02.2023 whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled in exercise of powers under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as well as the order dated 05.02.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was registered with the GST Authorities and is involved in the business of providing services to the Government. It is stated that on 14.01.2023, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice highlighting the fact that the petitioner has failed to furnish return for a continuous period of six months under Sections 39 of the CGST Act and was called upon to file a reply within 30 days.

3. It is stated that the petitioner could not reply the said show cause notice on account of the fact that the petitioner who is responsible to run the business was not well and also on account of the fact that all the papers were submitted to their counsel but the said counsel did not appear before the appellate authority nor did he place the version of the petitioner and on this ground the appeal was also dismissed befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top