Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
Sarojamma W/o Late Gangappa – Appellant
Versus
Jayamma W/o Late Byregowda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking writ to quash trial court order (Para 1) |
| 2. recommendations for timely trial court procedures (Para 2 , 10) |
| 3. background on partition suit and procedural history (Para 3 , 4 , 7) |
| 4. support for trial court's rejection of impleadment (Para 5) |
| 5. court's analysis of error in rejecting application (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. final order allowing writ and costs (Para 11) |
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs :
a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to quash the Order dated 18.11.2019, passed by the Hon'ble Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Nelamangala, dismissing I.A. No.23 in O.S. No. 146/2006, at Annexure-A.
b) to allow I.A. No.23 in O.S. No.146/2006; on the file of the Hon'ble Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Nelamangala.
c) issue any other appropriate writ, or order or direction as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Heard.
3. Petitioners have filed a suit for partition and separate possession. The said suit came to be decreed exparte on 23.6.2010. Thereafter, the petitioners executed a registered sale deed dated 7.3.2011 in favour of H.Narasimha Raju and thereafter, he has
The doctrine of lis pendens binds subsequent purchasers to partition suits; thus, the trial court erred in rejecting the impleadment application to ensure complete resolution of the property dispute.
The doctrine of lis pendens prevents a subsequent purchaser from acquiring rights in property under litigation; such purchasers are not necessary parties to the suit.
A second suit for partition is not maintainable concerning property previously partitioned; purchasers under lis pendens retain the right to appeal against decrees affecting their interests.
The court ruled that a second suit for partition is not maintainable if a previous decree regarding the same property exists, emphasizing the rights of a lis pendens purchaser to appeal.
A pendente lite purchaser can be added as a party to ongoing litigation to protect substantial interests, and such applications should typically be granted without prejudice.
A second suit for partition is not maintainable if the property has already been partitioned and a decree has been finalized; a lis pendens purchaser has the right to appeal against a decree affectin....
The doctrine of lis pendens does not affect prior subsisting rights, allowing innocent purchasers to enforce their claims based on preceding agreements.
The court ruled that transferees pendente lite are necessary parties in a partition suit for effective adjudication, subject to the outcome of the suit.
Purchasers of property in a partition suit may seek impleadment to assert equity; Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act permits their inclusion in ongoing litigation for effective adjudication.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
