Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
Mohammad Nawaz, K S Hemalekha
Principal Secretary To Government Department Of Revenue – Appellant
Versus
Somashekar, S/o Late Kashyappa Patil – Respondent
ORDER :
K S HEMALEKHA, J.
The present writ petition is filed by the State assailing the legality and correctness of the order dated 24.02.2022 in Application No.1138/2018 on the file of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal at Kalaburagi (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal” for short) whereby, the application filed by the respondent, challenging the Government's order, imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement from service was allowed. By the impugned order, the Tribunal set aside the disciplinary penalty and directed reinstatement of the respondent into service forthwith, along with all consequential benefits, including monetary benefits to which the respondent is legally entitle.
Brief facts:
2. One Veerashetty lodged a complaint against the respondent, who was serving as a First Division Assistant in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Bidar, alleging that the respondent had demanded a bribe of Rs.5,000/- in connection with an application submitted by Veerashetty for the conversion of his agriculture land bearing Sy.No.6/2, measuring 04 acres 20 guntas situated at Hamilapur village. In the complaint, it was stated that the bribe was allegedly demanded for dispatching
Disciplinary proceedings can be unjust if based on identical circumstances leading to a criminal acquittal, emphasizing the need for reliable evidence.
(1) Disciplinary Enquiry – Rules of evidence which apply to a criminal trial are distinct from those which govern a disciplinary enquiry – Acquittal of accused in a criminal case does not debar emplo....
The acquittal in a criminal trial should be considered in Disciplinary Proceedings, and there is a need for protection of honest employees from false implication.
An acquittal in a criminal case influences disciplinary proceedings if based on identical facts; punitive actions must respect judicial findings to avoid injustice.
The acquittal in a criminal case impacts disciplinary proceedings when both are based on the same evidence, necessitating a reevaluation of the disciplinary action.
Acquittal in a criminal trial does not automatically invalidate disciplinary proceedings, but substantial overlaps in evidence may necessitate reconsideration of the latter's findings. Procedural fai....
The standards of proof in criminal and disciplinary proceedings differ; acquittal in a criminal case does not preclude disciplinary action.
Disciplinary proceedings' standards differ from criminal trials; acquittal does not bar disciplinary action if evidence supports charges.
The standards for departmental inquiries differ from criminal trials; an acquittal does not prevent disciplinary actions if the acquittal is not honorific.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
