Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. D K SINGH, MS. TARA VITASTA GANJU, JJ
SRI RAJASEKHARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the petitioner’s enquiry and punishment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the implications of criminal acquittal. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. observations on the nature of evidence in domestic enquiry. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion on the validity of departmental proceedings amid criminal acquittal. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present writ petition has been filed impugning the enquiry report of the Karnataka Lokayukta dated 15.12.2015 bearing No.LOK-1/ARE-1/Enq-165/2013 (Annexure-A) and recommendation dated 08.01.2016 (Annexure-B) and an other recommendation dated 30.06.2016 (Annexure-B1). The petitioner has also challenged the punishment order dated 06.04.2021 (Annexure-C) for petitioner's compulsory retirement under Rule 8(vi) of the Karnataka Public Service Rules and the order dated 06.08.2021 (Annexure-J) for relieving from his duty from 06.08.2021.
2. A complaint was filed before the Lokayukta by one Sadashiva stating that on the applications filed before the Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Maski Taluk, Raichur District, one house was allotted to his father Gangappa and his elder brother Sidram. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
