Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
M.G.S. KAMAL
Lokamma W/o. K. S. Veerappa – Appellant
Versus
Basavaraj S/o. Kuchappa Korchar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.G.S. KAMAL, J.
1. This appeal is filed by plaintiff Nos.1 and 2, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 6th April 2016, passed in R.A. No.25/2014 by the Senior Civil Judge, Sirsi (for short “the First Appellate Court”). By this judgment, the First Appellate Court, while partly allowing the appeal filed by defendants / respondents herein, set aside the judgment and decree dated 27th March 2013, passed in O.S. No.125/2006 by the Prl. Civil Judge, Sirsi (for short “the trial Court”) insofar as it pertained to Schedule “A” property, holding that the plaintiffs are not entitled to a share in the said property. However, the Court further held that the plaintiffs are entitled to a 1/5th share in schedule “B” property.
2. The above suit in O.S. No.125/2006 was filed by the plaintiffs seeking partition and separate possession of their 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property, consisting of land bearing Sy.No.63 measuring 5 acres 36 guntas, as described in schedule “A” of the plaint, and a residential house bearing VPC No.59 situated at Badangode Village in Sirsi Taluka described as schedule “B” of the plaint.
3. The case of the plaintiffs is that one Kuchappa, son of V
Married daughters are entitled to share in tenanted property as recognized legal heirs under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, contrary to previous interpretations.
Occupancy rights in joint family property, though granted to one member, benefit the entire joint family, reaffirming joint interests despite claims of individual ownership.
Married daughters are entitled to a share in joint family properties, and their marital status does not negate their legal rights to inheritance as established by the Hindu Succession Act.
The court affirms joint family ownership of agricultural properties and recognizes claims of all family members, including married daughters, based on their historical contributions to the family est....
Interpretation of statutes governing property rights - Exclusion of married daughters from 'family' under KLR Act and application of Hindu Succession Act for partition.
Partition rights and classification of properties under succession laws are critical in determining share entitlement among siblings.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
The right to partition in joint family properties persists regardless of contest, and the trial court’s decree must be grounded in evidence of joint possession.
Daughters have equal rights to inherit family property under the Hindu Succession Act, regardless of their marital status or the timing of their birth relative to the Act's enactment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
