Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH
Nagaraju, S/o Late Siddashetty – Appellant
Versus
Puttalakshmamma Dead By Lrs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
H.P.SANDESH, J.
This matter is listed for admission and I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.1(d).
2. This miscellaneous second appeal is filed against the order of remand made by the First Appellate Court directing the appellant herein to seek for appropriate relief by filing comprehensive suit for declaration and consequential relief's, since there is a dispute with regard to the title and if such application is filed, the Trial Court shall allow the parties to adduce additional evidence and also directed to give opportunity to both the parties to lead additional evidence, if any and thereafter, matter shall be decided afresh after considering whether recourse of Order XXVI CPC is necessary.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant-plaintiff would vehemently contend that suit is filed only for bare injunction contending that suit schedule property is purchased by the plaintiff and defendants are interfering with possession of the plaintiff. Hence, entitled for the relief of permanent injunction. It is also contended that defendant No.1 having no manner of right, title or interest over the suit schedule property with a malafide in
A plaintiff seeking an injunction must amend their pleadings to include a declaration of title if the defendant raises substantial title disputes.
Suit of the plaintiff for bare injunction is not maintainable and the First Appellate Court could not have decreed the suit of the plaintiff, when the defendants apart from denying the title and poss....
In a suit for injunction over vacant land, genuine title disputes necessitate a suit for declaration; mere possession does not suffice without establishing title.
A suit for permanent injunction is not maintainable when a genuine dispute on title arises. The proper remedy is a comprehensive suit for declaration, reaffirming the principle that possession follow....
In property disputes, a plaintiff must provide clear evidence of lawful possession and ownership, especially when the title is contested; failure to do so may result in dismissal of claims for injunc....
In property disputes involving claims of possession and title, a plaintiff must provide clear evidence of lawful ownership and seek a declaration of title when the title is contested.
Civil Suit - Suit for injunction and declaration - Nature of claims made by both the parties against each others, the issue of possession cannot be decided without conducting an inquiry as to issue o....
In a title declaration suit, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof to establish ownership, and appellate courts cannot re-evaluate evidence unless findings are legally flawed.
In a suit for injunction against interference, absence of a substantial challenge to the plaintiff's title allows the suit to stand without a concurrent request for title declaration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
