Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI
H. Narayana, S/o Late Hanumantharayappa – Appellant
Versus
Chennagangamma, W/o Late Hanumantharayappa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.
This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2014, passed in R.A.No.182/2011 by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Doddaballapur, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to based on their ranking before the trial Court. The appellant was the plaintiff, and the respondents were the defendants.
3. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this appeal are as follows:
The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for partition and separate possession regarding the suit schedule properties. It is the case of the plaintiff that defendant No.1 is the mother, defendant No.2 is the uncle and defendant No.3 is the brother of the plaintiff. The suit schedule properties are the ancestral and joint family properties of the plaintiff and the defendants. The grandparents of the plaintiff i.e., late Gangappa and late Giriyamma had two sons and four daughters, namely late Hanumantharayappa, i.e., the father of the plaintiff, Chandrashekar, i.e., defendant No.2, Smt.Byramma, Smt.Lakshmamma, Smt.Jayamma and Smt.Channamma. The plaintiff’s father had two son
The court affirmed that unregistered gift deeds executed in favor of a family member, when substantiated by evidence, supersede claims of joint ownership based on ancestral property if no partition w....
The court affirmed that partition shares from ancestral property remain joint family property for descendants, entitling them to assert claims over the inherited property.
Previous family partition and lack of joint family status preclude the plaintiff from claiming coparcenary rights under Hindu law amendments.
The ancestral property, while partitioned, remains joint family property, allowing children of a coparcener to claim their legitimate share despite their father's sale to others.
Partition claims require substantial evidence of family status and prior division; mere admissions during cross-examination do not prove separation.
A father cannot bequeath his son's share in ancestral property as per Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 30.
In matters of inheritance in joint family properties, ancestral status prevails unless a valid Will is presented; thus, equitable shares must be allocated accordingly.
Upon the death of a defendant, legal heirs are entitled to equal shares in joint family properties under Hindu Succession Act, confirming the property as joint family assets.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
