SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1338

ASHOK S. KINAGI
Puttarangaiah – Appellant
Versus
N. Gangappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Siddamallappa P.M.
For the Respondent: Giridhar H.

Table of Content
1. suit for partition of ancestral properties. (Para 3)
2. court's analysis of claims regarding partition. (Para 4 , 8)
3. arguments regarding admission and prior partition claims. (Para 5 , 6)
4. determination of prior partition's legal implications. (Para 7 , 9)
5. final ruling: appeal dismissed. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

Ashok S. Kinagi, J.

1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2005, passed in O.S.No. 480/1999 by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr Dn.) & JMFC, Tumkur, confirmed by the judgment and decree dated 01.04.2011, passed in R.A.No. 175/2007 by the I Additional District Judge, Tumkur, the appellants have filed this second appeal.

2. Parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court. The appellants are the defendants 1 to 6 and respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff, respondents No. 2 to 9 are defendants 7 to 14 before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts leading rise to filing of this appeal are as under:

    The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition and separate possession in respect of suit schedule properties. The plaintiff, defendants 12 and 13 and father of defendants 1 to 6 are sons of Late Nagaiah. Defendants 7 to 11 are the sons and daughters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top