Mayura Sreeram W/o Late Dr. Sree Ramasetty vs Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vivek B.R.
For the Respondents: V.G. Bhanu Prakash, V. Shiva Reddy

Table of Content
1. factual background of the land grants (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. issues for legal consideration (Para 7)
3. overview of land revenue laws (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 20)
4. issues for consideration regarding alienation permissions. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21)
5. land grant rules conditions (Para 22 , 23 , 25 , 26)
6. court's interpretation of relevant statutes and previous rulings. (Para 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97)
7. intent behind ptcl act (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
8. supreme court interpretation of ptcl act (Para 79 , 80 , 84)
9. legal conclusion and application (Para 98 , 100 , 101)
10. conclusion on the requirement of government permission for alienation. (Para 99 , 102)
11. findings on specific resumption case (Para 103 , 106 , 109 , 110 , 112 , 114)
12. final orders on the writ petitions and their implications. (Para 104 , 105 , 107 , 108 , 111 , 113 , 115 , 1