IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
Sri Shivananja S/o Late Bhogayaiah - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 1098 Of 2024 (CS-RES)
Decided On : 02-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek relief against the registrar's directions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on the co-operative society and registrar's direction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners argue against the legality of the registrar's directions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. impleading applicants argue for their rights and the need for a new society. (Para 9) |
| 5. arguments against the establishment of competitive societies. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court's analysis of legal provisions governing co-operative societies. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. court finds no legal basis for the registrar's directions. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. final ruling on the legitimacy of the directions and order passed. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER :
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
1. The Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of appropriate nature to declare that Section 12(5)(6) the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT in ultra vires and in violation of Article 19(1)(G) and Article 43-B of The Constitution of India .
ii. Issue any writ of certiorari quashing the impugned directions bearing Sani No.43:RSR:GRN:12(5):PR:2023-24 dated 29.11.2023 passed by the Respondent no.4 vide Annexure-A and
iii. Permit the Respondent No.5 society to continue to function in its existing area of operation as per its Bye-laws; and
iv. Grant such other relief as may be deemed fit to grant under the circumstances of the case in the interest of equity and justice.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset submits that he would not press for prayer (i) above, as such prayer (i) is deleted.
3. The Petitioners claim to be directors of Respondent No.5-Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society (hereinafter for brevity referred to as a “PACS”) which has been registered under the provisions of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “KCS Act”). The Society is engaged in the business of acceptance of various types of deposits, providing credit facilities to its members, supplying of fertilisers, manure, agriculture implements, ration items, etc. In terms of the by-laws of the Society, the Society only functions and carries on business with its members, a non-member cannot deal with the Society.
4. Respondent No.2-the Registrar of Co-operative Societies (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “the Registrar”) issued a circular on 12.05.2017 directing the Gram Panchayat to take steps to form a separate PACS in each of the Gram Panchayats where there is no PACS, on the basis of the said circular the Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, in a meeting held on 03.08.2023 decided to form a new PSCS for Bechanahalli Gram Panchayat, in pursuance of which the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (hereinafter for brevity referred to as “ARCS”) issued a direction on 29.11.2023, under Sub-section (5) of Section 12 of the KCS Act directing the Society to delete Bechanahalli Gram Panchayat from its area of operation within 15 days so as to enable the formation of a new PACS in Bechanahalli.
5. The Society submitted a representation on 28.12.2023 stating that in order to comply with the directions, the Society would have to call for a Special General Meeting which would take some time and therefore requested the ARCS not to implement the direction until such time.
6. In the meanwhile, the villagers of Bechanahalli and certain other members of the Society had addressed a letter on 29.12.2023 to the ARCS, requesting the ARCS not to implement the directions and not to form a new PACS in Bechanahalli which has also not been considered by Respondent No.4. It is in that background, that the Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the aforesaid relief.
7. Sri.Jayakumar S. Patil, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submits that;
7.1. The impugned direction dated 29.11.2023 is stated to have been issued in pursuance of a circular dated 12.05.2017 issued by the Registrar, thereafter the Registrars having kept quiet







The Registrar cannot direct the deletion of a Gram Panchayat from a co-operative society's operational area, affirming multiple PACS can coexist in the same area, promoting autonomy as per the KCS Ac....
The Registrar lacks authority to delete areas from existing co-operative societies to facilitate new establishments, emphasizing that PACSs can coexist in the same area under the Karnataka Co-operati....
Legislative amendments to cooperative laws, ensuring deemed membership and equitable treatment among societies, upheld as valid under constitutional provisions, without infringing on court decisions.
The court declared Section 28(2A) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 unconstitutional for violating democratic control and autonomy principles, affirming the right to form associations un....
A competing co-operative society lacks locus standi to challenge another's registration unless it suffers a legal wrong, underscoring the principle that competition must be encouraged.
The State has the authority under Section 101 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act to exempt a society from provisions if public interest warrants it, including overlapping service areas, validat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.