Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Anant Ramanath Hegde
M.R.Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Directors And The Appellate Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal from service and financial recovery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural violations and evidentiary issues. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence against disciplinary findings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 47 , 48) |
ORDER :
Anant Ramanath Hegde, J.
The petitioner is before this court aggrieved by the order dated 09.03.2009 passed by the appellate authority confirming the order dated 01.10.2008, passed by the disciplinary authority dismissing the petitioner for service.
2. In terms of the order dated 01.10.2008, the disciplinary authority dismissed the petitioner from service and also directed to forfeit the gratuity and to recover sum of Rs.10,41,719/-.
3. Brief facts noticed from the pleadings are as under:
The petitioner was appointed on 07.02.1975 as Accounts Supervisor in Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. On 28.04.2003, a charge-sheet is issued against the petitioner and 13 others alleging negligence in discharge of du
The disciplinary authority can dismiss an employee for negligence and financial discrepancies, provided adequate reasons for disagreement with an enquiry officer's findings are documented as per regu....
Regulation 7(2) of the Punjab National Bank Officer Employees’ Regulation, 1977 did not stipulate granting of an opportunity to represent against disagreement recorded by Disciplinary Authority.
The Disciplinary Authority must issue a reasoned notice of disagreement when departing from exonerating findings in disciplinary proceedings, ensuring the principles of natural justice are upheld.
Point of Law- The word “consider”, is of great significance. Its dictionary meaning of the same is, “to think over”, “to regard as”, or “deem to be”. Hence, there is a clear connotation to the effect....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering the defence of the delinquent employee and recording reasons in decision-making processes, highlighting the obligation to adhere to principles of....
Procedural irregularities in disciplinary proceedings do not automatically invalidate the inquiry unless they result in prejudice to the employee's ability to defend themselves.
The principles of natural justice require that a disciplinary authority must provide reasons for differing from an inquiry officer's findings and allow the employee an opportunity to respond before i....
Distinct allegations against employee charged in the same transaction would be justified being based on a valid classification and no perversity or arbitrariness can be alleged in the process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
