Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Maintenance to Wife Should Not Encourage Idleness or Be Excessive: Gujarat HC Reduces Family Court Enhancement under CrPC Ss.125,127
11 Mar 2026
Dehadrai Seeks Dismissal of Moitra's Dog Custody Suit
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV, VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
Radha W/o Rajashekhar Gaonkar – Appellant
Versus
Anand Tippanna Sonappanavar – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, J.
1. MFA No.103784/2023 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation and shifting of entire liability on the Insurance Company, whereas MFA No.102632/2023 is filed by the Insurance Company challenging saddling of 80% liability on it. Both the appeals are arising out of the judgment and award dated 30.03.2023 passed in MVC No.2302/2021 on the file of XI Addl. District Judge and Addl. MACT, Belagavi [For short ‘Tribunal’]
2. Brief facts leading to filing of these appeals are that on 11.07.2021 at about 8:30 p.m., the deceased-Prasad Gaonkar was proceeding from Dharwad to Haliyal riding a motorcycle bearing No.KA-31/Y-5533 along with pillion rider- Raghavendra Hedge. When he reached near the spot of the accident i.e. Sai Dhaba, rider of another motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-25/HB-6930 came from Halligeri towards
The court ruled that contributory negligence assessment by the Tribunal was sound, while modifying the compensation based on a more accurate income assessment, leading to a total compensation of Rs.2....
The proper assessment of negligence and income in fatal accident cases is essential for determining just compensation, reinforced by precedent in awarding future loss prospects.
The court upheld the Tribunal's apportionment of liability for accident compensation, establishing 70% liability on the Insurance Company for payments with recovery rights against the motorcycle owne....
Court affirmed that contributory negligence can be apportioned among parties, and under composite negligence, claimants can seek full compensation from any tortfeasor.
Compensation claims under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act do not require proof of rashness or negligence, focusing instead on vehicle involvement, thereby modifying liability and enhancing aw....
Insurance Company remains liable for compensation despite the rider's lack of a valid driving license; compensation must account for future prospects and personal expenses.
Non-holding of a driving license does not constitute contributory negligence if clear evidence shows the other party is solely at fault.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article