Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Prema Kumara K. S/o H.B. Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
(i) Issue the writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction quashing the Government Order No ED 590 UNE 2014 Bengaluru dated 22-03-2019 (Annexure - 'L') passed by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Higher Education (Universities) of State of Karnataka (first respondent), the order No KA JA V V/AV/No 1202/2018-19 dated 23-03-2019 (Annexure - 'M') of the Registrar of the Karnataka Janapada Vishwa Vidyalaya (Second respondent) and the endorsement No KA V HAM: KU SA: NI SE B: 2018-19/81 dated 26-03-2019 (Annexure 'P') of the Registrar of Kannada Vishwa Vidyalaya, Hampi (third respondent).
(ii) Declare that the notification Nos KA JA V V No 531/2018-19 dated 22-09-2018 and KA JA V V No 189/2019-20 dated 31-05-2019 (Annexures "X" & "Y" respectively) issued by the Karnataka Janapada Vishwa Vidyalaya (second respondent) inviting application for the post of "Senior Research Officer" is concerned is unsustainable.
(iii) Direct the first and second respondent to reinstate the petitioner to the post of "Senior Research Officer" in the Karnataka Janapada Vishwa Vidyalaya (second respondent)
The court reinforced that annulments of administrative orders require adherence to procedural legitimacy and notification, establishing that discretionary actions should adhere to principles of natur....
The failure to provide a hearing before terminating services violates principles of natural justice, rendering the decision invalid.
Appointment of the petitioner and the re-designation are concerned, both the issues have been given a quietus by this Court. It is not that the State Government was not aware about the appointment so....
Promotion cannot be void due to allegations against a foundational Government Order unless fraud is proven; equal treatment under the law is mandatory.
An employee appointed by deputation is entitled to due process, including notice and an opportunity to respond before removal, as mandated by statutory provisions and constitutional protections.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of Section 17(16) and (17) of the act of 1998 and the determination of the maintainability of the petitioner's....
The court held that the repatriation of the petitioner was illegal as it violated the Executive Council's resolution regarding her absorption as Deputy Registrar.
The State Government's liability for salary payments to college staff as per Section 60-E of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, and the inability of government orders to override statutory rules.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
