Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Manjunath K., S/o. Kariyappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following prayer:
"i. WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:-
1993, at Serial No.10, for acqutisiton of Land in Sy.No.15/6, of Shettyhalli Village, Tumakuru Taluk, published in the name of Sri.Siddaiah S/o Marisiddaiah, with respect to site No.39 of the petitioner measuring East to West -51 feet and North to south 30 feet, in totoatl 1530Sq.feet, now comes under Jayanagara west, Tumakuru City, published by the 1st respondent, the State of Karnataka, department of Department of Revenue, MS Building, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru, Rep. by its Principal Secretry vide ANNEXURE-W.
1991, at Serial No. 15, for acqutisiton of Land in Sy.No. 15/6, of Shettyhalli Village, Tumakuru Taluk, published in the name of Sri.Siddaiah S/o. Marisiddaiah, with respect to site No.39 of the petitioner measuring East to West -51 feet and North to south 30 feet, in totoatl 1530Sq feet, now comes under Jayanagara west, Tumakuru City, published by the 1st responden
Subsequent purchasers post-notification under the Land Acquisition Act cannot challenge acquisition proceedings, as such sales are deemed void and they may only seek compensation.
A subsequent purchaser has no right to challenge the original acquisition or claim any benefits under the Land Acquisition Act 1894. The sale transaction after the issuance of the Section 4(1) notifi....
The court established that an acquisition may lapse if not substantially implemented within a reasonable timeframe, affirming the landowner's right to challenge ineffective acquisitions.
A subsequent purchaser has no standing to challenge the acquisition or its lapsing.
Subsequent purchasers cannot challenge land acquisition proceedings, and the lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Fair Compensation Act depends on the fulfillment of possession....
Once the land is acquired and vests in the State, it cannot be divested, and subsequent purchasers have no authority to challenge the acquisition proceeding.
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – Right which has been lost due to passage of time cannot be revived by virtue of deposit of amount subsequent to orders of High Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
