Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
South Indian Sugar Mills Association Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners/South Indian Sugar Mills Association, Karnataka and Indian Sugar Mills Association are before this Court calling in question Notifications dated 26-12-2023, 28-06-2024 and 01-10-2024 issued by Government of India. During the subsistence of the subject petition, other notifications come to be issued on 31-12-2024, 08-04-2025 and 22-04-2025; all of these are called in question and seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to remove sugar from the purview of Jute Packaging Materials (Compulsory Use in Packing Commodities) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short) in the light of several recommendations that are appended to the petition. In this order, facts would be referred to the 1st petitioner.
2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:
2.1. The 1st petitioner is the South Indian Sugar Mills Association, a society registered under Section 17 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1961 the registration of which happens on 06-11-1995. The petitioner claims to have a strength of 41 sugar mills in Karnataka as its members. The respondents are the respective departments of Government of India in the Ministry of Te
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
