SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Infosys Limited - Appellant
Versus
The Special Land Acquisition Officer Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 15656, 25579 of 2022
Decided On : 19-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nitin Prasad
For the Respondents: Ashok Narayan Nayak, Rashmi M. Rao

The court upholds the validity of a mutual settlement agreement between parties, quashing previous orders and recognizing the parties' voluntary consent to the settlement terms.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 2013 - Settlement of disputes - Consent between parties - Writ petitions disposed of following joint memo of settlement - Payment of INR 42,83,750/- agreed upon as full and final settlement of claims in respect of acquired land - Interim orders vacated. (Paras 1, 2)

(B) Compromise - Parties confirm mutual agreement without coercion - Moolya Family indemnifies the petitioner from future claims. (Paras 2.ii, 2.v)

(C) Validity of joint memo - Court recognizes mutual consent and terms of settlement as satisfactory. (Paras 2.iv, 2.vii)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged an order passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. However, both parties reached an amicable settlement involving a payment to the Moolya Family and agreed upon various conditions to quash previous orders and claims.

Findings of Court:
The Writ Petitions are disposed of, and the impugned order dated 09-09-2021 is quashed as settled.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the enforceability of the settlement terms and the legality of the prior order.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized the importance of mutual consent and voluntary agreements in resolving disputes outside of court, reinforcing that both parties entered the agreement freely and intentionally.

Result: Writ Petitions disposed.

Table of Content
1. parties settled the dispute amicably. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court quashes previous order and disposes writ petitions. (Para 3)

ORDER :

1. Petitioners are before this Court calling in question an order passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 09-09-2021.

2. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties to the lis have settled the dispute amicably. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo of Settlement. The relevant paragraphs of the Joint Memo reads as follows:

“5. During the course of the present proceedings, the parties made attempts to resolve the matter and have agreed to settle the disputes amicably on the following terms:

i. The Petitioner shall make payment of INR 42,83,750/- as full and final settlement of all the claims of the Moolya Family in respect of the Acquired Land, the Alternate Land, the said letter dated 26.12.2012, Order dated 09.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.1, or any other claim whatsoever in respect thereof or otherwise against the Petitioner.

ii. The parties have agreed to file this joint Memo and request this Hon'ble Court to defer the matter to a period beyond 30 days from date of filing of this Memo. The Petitioner shall make payment to the Moolya Family on or before the 30th day of filing of the present Memo. Upon the Moolya Family confirming receipt of payment or the Petitioner demonstrating proof of payment being made, this Hon'ble Court may dispose of the petitions as having been settled in terms hereof.

ii. The Petitioner shall make payment of the said amount within the timeline stated above by way of Demand Draft made in the name of Mr. Nagesh J., Respondent No.16 in W.P No. 25579/2022 who is the General Power of Attorney holder of Respondent Nos.4 to 15. The said amount will be divided amongst the Moolya family according to their understanding amongst each other, without reference or liability to the Petitioner. Respondent Nos. 4 to 15 hereby confirm that Respondent No. 16 is authorized to receive the settlement amount on their behalf and payment to him is in full and final satisfaction of their claims as against the Petitioner.

iv. The Moolya Family confirms that they are the legal heirs of late Mr. Rama Moolya and no other person or persons have any right or claim in respect of the Acquired Land, the Alternate Land, the said letter dated 26.12.2012, Order dated 09.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.1, or any other claim whatsoever against the Petitioner.

v. The Moolya Family shall indemnify the Petitioner for any loss or liability in the event any other person(s) makes any claims against the Petitioner and shall satisfy any such claims either existing or future, independently and without reference or liability to the Petitioner.

vi. Both Parties state that the interim orders, if any, in force shall stand vacated and the said Order dated 09.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.1 shall stand nullified.

vii. The Parties hereby declare and state that they have entered into executed and admitted execution of this Joint Memo of their own free will and volition, without any coercion or undue influence, and that they jointly and/or severally accept to be unconditionally bound by the terms and conditions of this Joint Memo.”

3. In the light of the compromise entered into between the parties on the terms as aforequoted, the following:

ORDER :

(i) Writ Petitions are disposed.

(ii) Impugned Order dated 09-09-2021 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer stands quashed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top