SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2429

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Subramani (died)- Appellant 
versus
Kumarasamy – Respondent 
C.R.P.No.4993 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.28069 of 2024 
Decided on : 22-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.T.S. Baskaran
For the Respondent:  Mr.K. Hemanathan

The court upheld the validity of a Joint Memo of Compromise, emphasizing mutual consent in resolving property disputes.

Headnote:

(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 151 - Settlement of disputes - Joint Memo of Compromise filed by parties - The parties agreed to set aside a sale deed and recognize ownership of specific properties as per the compromise - The court disposed of the Civil Revision Petition based on the Joint Memo of Compromise. (Paras 2, 4, 6)

(B) Compromise Agreements - The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the terms of the compromise and recognized the mutual agreement of the parties to resolve their disputes amicably. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The Civil Revision Petition was filed against an order dismissing a petition to set aside a sale deed. The parties reached a settlement regarding property ownership and agreed to set aside the sale deed concerning a specific portion of land.

Findings of Court:
The court accepted the Joint Memo of Compromise and disposed of the Civil Revision Petition, allowing the parties to proceed according to their agreement.

Issues: The main issue was whether the parties could amicably settle their disputes and the validity of the Joint Memo of Compromise.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Joint Memo of Compromise was valid and binding, emphasizing the importance of mutual consent in resolving disputes.

Result: Civil Revision Petition disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise.

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 03.03.2020 passed in IA No. 249 of 2018 in Unnumbered AS in CFR No. 10264/2018 on the file of Principal District Judge, Erode.

2. The learned counsels appearing on either side submitted that the parties have arrived at a settlement and filed a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 15.04.2025 signed by both the parties and their respective counsels.

3. All the petitioners excepting the fifth petitioner Kaliyammal, and the respondents 1 and 5 appeared through Video conferencing, and Mr.T.S.Baskaran, learned counsel for the petitioners identified them. He submitted that the fifth petitioner had affixed her Left Thumb impression while he watched her through video conferencing and to that effect he has also made an endorsement at Page No. 8 of the Joint Memo of Compromise.

4. The Joint Memo of Compromise dated 15.04.2025 is extracted hereunder:

"JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND 1ST & 5TH RESPONDENTS

1. The above Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the fair and decretal order dated 03.03.2020 passed in I.A. No. 249 of 2018 in unnumbered A.S. in C.F.R. No. 10264 of 2018 on the file of the Learned Principal Judge, Erode. The Appeal was filed against the dismissal of the petition filed in E.A. No. 294 of 2004 in E.P. 127 of 2001 in O.S.No. 61 of 2000 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam. One Subramani who is the husband of 1st petitioner, father of the Petitioners 2 and 3 and son of 4th Petitioner and one Ramayal who is the mother of 5th Petitioner herein had filed an application in E.A. 294 of 2004 to set aside the sale deed on 14.10.2004 and to raise the attachment ordered on the petition mentioned property. The said application in E.A. 294 of 2004 was dismissed and against which the appeal was preferred before the Learned Principal Judge, Erode with a petition to condone the delay. As the Petition to condone the delay in preferring the said appeal was dismissed, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

2. It is submitted that pending the proceedings, the 1st Respondent settled the Schedule 'A' mentioned property vacant land along with other properties in favour of his wife Lakshmi as per the settlement deed dated 05.09.2022 vide. Document No.6626 of 2022 on the file of SRO, Sathyamangalam. Further, the said Lakshmi settled the said property in favour of her daughter K.Radha as per the settlement deed dated 28.06.2023 vide. Document No.4711 of 2023 on the file of SRO, Sathyamangalam. The said K.Radha in turn settled the aforesaid property in favour of the 5th Respondent herein as per the settlement deed dated 09.10.2023 vide. Document No.7386 of 2023 on the file of SRO, Sathyamangalam. The 5th Respondent who is also the grandson of the 1 Respondent herein is succeed to the Schedule 'A' mentioned property as stated above. Therefore, the 5th Respondent was impleaded as one of the Respondents as he is also a proper and necessary party for proper disposal of the above said Civil Revision Petition. The Respondent 2 to 4 herein have no right over the Schedule Mentioned Property and they are not necessary parties to this compromise.

3. Pending the Civil Revision Petition, the dispute between the parties is amicably settled in the following manner:

a) The both the parties hereby agreed that the sale deed held on 14.10.2004 in E.P. No. 127 of 2001 on the file of the Learned Sub-Ordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam is set-aside to an extent of 2180 Sq.ft in respect of the property purchased by the petitioners under the registered sale deed dated 10.01.2000 Vide Document No. 3027 of 2000 on the file of the SRO, Sathyamangalam.

b) The 1st Respondent and 5th Respondent hereby agreed that the petitioners are the absolute owners of the property measuring 2180 Sq.ft in Survey no. 248/2 (Old Survey no. 270 A-B) in Malayadipudur Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Sathyamangalam Sub-Registration District, Gobichettipalayam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top