IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Sathish, S/o Sri. Nanjundappa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
Crl.P.No.2526/2024 is filed by the accused seeking quashing of the proceedings pending in Crime No.46/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 324, 323, 506 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the 1989 Act'). Similarly, Crl.P.No.5810/2024 is filed by the accused in respect of another case arising out of the same set of allegations made by the respondent no.2/Srirama, who is the de facto complainant, wherein charge sheet has been filed in Spl.Case SC/ST No.35/2023 for offences punishable under Sections 354A(1)(ii), 504, 506, 509 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the 1989 Act.
-
2. The case of respondent No.2/Srirama is that on 28.01.2024 at about 8.00 a.m., while he was returning to his house, the accused, who came on a motorbike, abused him in filthy language, threatened him with dire consequences, and physically assaulted him, more particularly by kicking him. Based on this complaint, Crime No.46/2024 was registered against the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, reiterating the grounds urged in both






The misuse of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for personal vendetta undermines the law's purpose and warrants quashing of the proceedings.
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute offences under IPC or SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie grounds for prosecution.
Civil dispute between parties cannot be converted into criminal proceedings.
The court established that inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC can quash proceedings lacking sufficient evidence or motivated by malice.
Criminal proceedings arising from a genuine civil property dispute, which lack the essential statutory ingredients for the alleged penal offences and are invoked merely to exert pressure, are liable ....
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the need for prima facie grounds for prosecution.
The court established that insufficient evidence and lack of specific allegations can justify quashing of FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the misuse of the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and to discourage dis....
The judgment establishes the principle that when appeal is specifically provided for in a particular act against orders other than interlocutory, the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot b....
The court emphasized the requirement of proving allegations during trial and the limited exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIRs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.