Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Archana Patil W/o Subhir Gorgonha – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner, the sole accused, now seeks sanctuary before this Court invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. challenging the legality of proceedings initiated in Spl.C.C.No.2050 of 2024 pending before the Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City (FTSC-1) arising out of crime in Crime No.533 of 2024, a case which bears grave imprint of offences alleged under Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘Act’ for short).
2. The brief tapestry of facts, interwoven, are as follows:-
2.1. The 2nd respondent is the complainant. It is the case of the prosecution that the 2nd respondent with her husband one Bipin Therat Sethumadhavan and two children – Master Xxxxx aged about 13 years and Miss. Bhadra Priya, aged about 10 years were residing in a rented villa, Villa No.132 of Adharsh Vista, a community living at Doddanekundi, Bangalore since 2020. The Adharsh vista community living consisted of 200 villas. The petitioner is a resident at Villa No.127, residing at the said place since 22 years. The complainant and the family come to reside at the neighbouring villa. The bond of neighbourly warmth b
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act is gender neutral, allowing for prosecution of women for sexual offences against male minors, and delays in reporting do not invalidate proceedings....
The prosecution must provide substantial proof in sexual assault cases; the absence of medical evidence undermines the victim's testimony without corroboration.
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, and that slight penetration constitutes an offense under the POCSO Act, regardless of t....
The court affirmed that a victim's testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the mandatory minimum sentence under the POCSO Act.
The court clarified the distinction between sexual assault and aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the need for evidence of penetration to establish the latter.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
