Md Kainool vs State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 118

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 118

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZA
Md Kainool – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sinha, Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shashi Bala Verma.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, ACJ. – The sole appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC putting to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 02.09.2021 and the order of sentence dated 03.09.2021, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 6th-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Banka in G.R. No. 2642 of 2015 arising out of Banka Mahila Police Station Case No. 56 of 2015, whereby the sole appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under: –

Conviction under Section	Sentence
Conviction under Section	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
Section 4 POCSO Act	R.I. for 10 years	25,000/-	R.I. for 1 year
Section 6 POCSO Act	R.I. for 20 years	50,000/-	R.I. for 2 years
Section 376(2) of the IPC	R.I. for 10 years	25,000/-	R.I. for 1 year

2. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

3. So as to conceal identity of the victim, her name does not figure in the present judgment and order and has been referred to as 'the victim'.

4. A written report of the victim's mother (PW-4), dated 08.12.2015, is the basis for registration

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 118

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZAMd Kainool – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZA
Md Kainool – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent