Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Ishan V Shriyan, S/o Vinay Shriyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing based on allegations from a death note. (Para 2) |
| 2. the death note reveals significant emotional turmoil but lacks legal grounds for abetment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal threshold for abetment requires tangible evidence of instigation or aiding. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. the court quashes the proceedings due to insufficient evidence of abetment. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
The petitioner, an engineering student, hardly aged about 18 years, is seeking quashing of proceedings pending in Crime No.15/2025 registered by Kempapura Agrahara police station for the offence punishable under sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
A crime has been registered at the instance of respondent No.2/defacto complainant, alleging that his son, who was pursuing engineering, committed suicide. It is alleged that the present petitioner, arrayed as accused No.1, along with another friend, arrayed as accused No.2, abetted the commission of suicide. Relying upon the contents of the death note allegedly left behind by the deceased, the crime has been registered for the aforesaid offences.
4. The material on record discloses a deeply distressing set of facts. As
The elements of abetment of suicide require direct provocation or instigation, not merely emotional expressions from a suicide note.
To establish abetment of suicide, instigation, conspiracy, or aid must be proven, which was not established in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of an active role and instigation in abetment to suicide, as well as the need to consider the mental state and circumstances of the....
The lack of evidence to establish abetment to commit suicide based on the contents of the suicide note.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for an offence under Section 306 of IPC, there must be active suggestion, instigation, or encouragement on the part of the accused to abet the....
For abetment of suicide, intention of the accused to provoke suicide must be established; mere harassment does not suffice.
For abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding the act, which was not established in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
