SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Devaraj Nayak And Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Karnataka Rptd By Its Prl. Secretary Dept.Of Education (Higher Education) - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 104193 OF 2025 (S-REG)
Decided On : 12-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Pruthvi K S, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sriyuths. Sharad V. Magadum, Aga, Anoop G. Deshpande, Advocate

The court affirmed the right of guest lecturers to participate in recruitment processes and protected their current positions, ensuring fairness under UGC regulations.

Headnote:(A) Education Laws - UGC Regulations, 2018 - Writ for certiorari and mandamus - Petitioners, guest lecturers for over ten years, challenged notification disqualifying M.Phil holders without NET/SLET/Ph.D - Court allowed participation in recruitment, emphasizing their right to due process - The petitioners cannot be disturbed from their current posts pending recruitment - This is in alignment with principles of justice and equity as laid down in previous rulings. (Paras 1, 3)

(B) Right to Fair Opportunity - Court highlighted the necessity for fairness in recruitment processes and guaranteed the petitioners their current positions until recruitment completion, reinforcing that legal entitlements must be respected. (Paras 1, 3)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged several notifications disqualifying them based on educational qualifications while seeking to regularize their services as guest lecturers, relating to UGC regulations and the notions of equity. Redress sought included the right to join the ongoing recruitment process.

Findings of Court:
The writ petition was partly allowed, affirming the petitioners' rights to participate in the recruitment process while ensuring their current positions remain secure until the completion of the process.

Issues: The key issues involved the legality of disqualifying M.Phil holders and the procedural rights of the petitioners in the recruitment process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the petitioners have the right to participate in the recruitment process while safeguarding their positions until it is concluded, consistent with the principles of justice and due process.

Result: Writ petition partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. relief sought by the petitioners. (Para 1)
2. petitioners as guest lecturers aggrieved by circular. (Para 2)
3. recruitment process permissible for petitioners. (Para 3)

ORDER :

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.

1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned notification bearing no KaShiE/NEVI-1/AOoAa/99/2024-25 dated 02.01.2025 issued by the respondent no.2 vide Annexure-B.

b) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned order bearing no. KaShiE/NEVI-1/AOoAa/99/2024-25 dated 25/4/2025 issued by the respondent no.2 vide Annexure-C.

c) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned order bearing no. KaShiE/NEVI- 1/AOoAa/28/2025-26 dated 25/6/2025 issued by the respondent no.2 vide Annexure-D.

d) Issue a writ in the mandamus by directing the respondents to regularize the petitioners who have been worked for more than 10 years as guest lecturers in their respective colleges in the interest of justice and equity.

e) Declaring the petitioners who have possessed only M.Phil qualification prior to 11/7/2009 without NET/SLET/Ph.Das ineligible to hold the post of Assistant Professors/Lecturer for the academic year 2024-25 as arbitrary, illegal and not sustainable in the eye of law.

f) Direct the respondents to consider the M.Phil qualification obtained by the petitioners prior to 11/7/2009 as per UGC regulations, 2018 is the qualification on par with the candidates who have passed NET/SLET/Ph.D examinations and extend all the benefits which they are entitled to on par with them.

g) Direct the respondent no.1 and 2 to continue the petitioners as guest lecturers without replacing them by another set of guest lecturers in terms of the law laid down by the Hon’ble High Court Of Karnataka in Pirsa Sing’s Case and regularize the services of the petitioners who have in continuous service for more than 10 years and extend all the benefits arising out of the said regularization.

h) Direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as guest lecturers in their respective colleges till the completion of academic year 2025-26, in the interest of justice and equity.

i) Grant such other relief/s as deems fit in the circumstances of the case and allow the writ petition with costs in the interest of justice and equity.

2. The petitioners claim to be the guest lecturers and claim to be aggrieved by a circular which has been issued for appointment of guest lecturers for the ensuing year.

3. The process for recruitment has been taken up by the respondents. It would always be permissible for the petitioners to also participate in the said process and if they are successful, to be appointed to such post of guest lecturers. The appointment process cannot be stopped at the instance of the petitioners. As such, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Writ petition is partly allowed

ii. The petitioners are permitted to participate in the recruitment process in terms of the circulars dated 02.01.2025, 25.04.2025 and 25.06.2025 issued by respondent No.2 at Annexures-B, C and D respectively.

iii. Needless to say that until the said recruitment process is completed the petitioners are not to be disturbed from their current post.

iv. Further needless to say in the event of the petitioners being successful and being appointed as guest lecturers, they cannot be disturbed.

v. Pending I.A. stand disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top