SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
Pramod S. Jadhav S/o Satappa Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 100360 of 2025
Decided On : 06-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Upadhye Aravind
For the Respondents: P.N. Hatti, Gangadhar J.M.

The court upheld the petitioners' right to be considered for regularization and participate in recruitment, emphasizing procedural fairness under Articles 14, 16, and 21.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Writ petition seeking to quash a notification for appointment of guest lecturers and to regularize the services of petitioners - Circular deemed arbitrary and illegal. (Para 1-2)

(B) Recruitment Process - Petitioners to participate in the recruitment for guest lecturers and were to be permitted to stay in current positions pending outcomes. (Para 3-6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, claiming to be guest lecturers, challenged a circular affecting their appointment and sought regularization of their services.

Findings of Court:
The representation for regularization must be considered within four weeks; Petitioners not to be disturbed during recruitment.

Issues: Main issues revolved around the legality of the circular and the petitioners' right to regularization versus recruitment participation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that while the regularization process needs to be expedited, the petitioners should still be allowed to apply for guest lecturer positions.

Result: Writ petition partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
ORDER :

1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

1. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order quashing the notification bearing No No.KaShiE/NEVI-AUA/99/2024-25 dated 02.01.2025 at Annexure-BV issued by the 2nd respondent as the same is illegal, arbitrary and violation of article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner continue their service in respective colleges without instating the additional qualifications.

3. Direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners by considering the lengthy of services and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.

2. The petitioners claim to be the guest lecturers and claim to be aggrieved by a circular which has been issued for appointment of guest lecturers for the ensuing year.

-

3. The process for recruitment has been taken up by the respondents. It would always be permissible for the petitioners to also participate in the said process and if they are successful, to be appointed to such post of guest lecturers. The appointment process cannot be stopped at the instance of the petitioners.

4. The petitioners contended that they have also submitted a representation for regularization of the services of the petitioners. If that be so, it would be required for the respondents to pass necessary orders thereon prior to the recruitment process. As such, I pass the following:

ORDER :

i. Writ petition is partly allowed.

-

ii. The representation submitted by the petitioners for regularization is directed to be considered by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

iii. If the services of the petitioners are not regularized they were permitted to participate in the recruitment process in terms of the circular dated 02.01.2025 issued by respondent No.2 at Annexure-BV.

iv. Needless to say that until the said recruitment process is completed the petitioners are not to be disturbed from their current post.

v. Further needless to say in the event of the petitioners being successful and being appointed as guest lecturers, they cannot be disturbed.

vi. Pending I.A. stand disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top