SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1692

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Elixir Industries – Appellant
Versus
Aarman Solutions Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI PRADEEP G.C., ADVOCATE

ORDER :

M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.

The petitioner – defendant is calling in question an order dated 10.06.2025, passed by the LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court), (CCH-83), Bengaluru, on I.A.No.2 filed under Section 13A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, in Commercial O.S.No.206/2024, rejecting the written statement filed by the petitioner/defendant, on the score that it is beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the CPC.

-

2. The petitioner and the respondent enter into a leave and license agreement for certain amount with terms and conditions. It transpires that there were several transactions between the parties. Due to some dispute between them, the respondent - plaintiff institutes a commercial suit in Commercial O.S.No.206/2024 against the petitioner for recovery of money of ₹27,82,537/- towards the refund of security deposit and interest of ₹5,84,332/- at 12% p.a., from 30.04.2022, till the date of institution of the suit. The suit is filed on 05.02.2024. The case at hand is not on the merit of the matter. The concerned Court issued summons to the petitioner – defendant. On 16-01-2025, the petitioner – defen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top