SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
M.G. UMA, J. 
 
Amaresha, S/o. Bangarappa – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Addl. State Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 200098 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS)) C/W Criminal Appeal No. 200100 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS)) Criminal Appeal No. 200104 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS))
Decided On : 05-08-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Smt. Ambika Ishwaraj Chowdapur, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Smt. Arati Patil, HCGP, Sri M. Sudhakarrao, Advocate.

Court affirmed convictions for assault under IPC but reversed those for attempted murder and caste-based abuse due to lack of evidence, emphasizing intent and corroborative testimony.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 504, 326, 307 - Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Section 3(1)(x) - Conviction and sentence of accused for multiple offences upheld partially with some convictions set aside - Evidence of eyewitnesses established guilt for assault but not for caste-based abuse - Prosecution failed to prove intention to cause death under Section 307 IPC - Sentences modified with provisions for concurrent running and compensation to victim. (Paras 1-20)

(B) Criminal Appeals - The court held that the conviction under certain sections should be maintained while addressing errors in others based on lack of evidence. (Para 20)

Facts of the case:
The accused were convicted for attacking the complainant with various weapons leading to severe injuries, but were acquitted on certain charges due to insufficient evidence.

Findings of Court:
The court modified the sentences, upholding certain convictions while overturning others, recognizing the prosecution's errors.

Issues: The main issues included whether the accused intended to kill the victim and if the charge under the SC/ST Act was substantiated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that while the assault was confirmed, the prosecution failed to establish the accused’s intent to cause death as required for certain charges.

Result: Appeals allowed in part, with specific convictions upheld and modified sentences.

Table of Content
1. accused convicted under ipc and sc/st act (Para 2 , 3)
2. prosecution witnesses corroborate assault evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. description of injuries not sufficient for section 307 ipc (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
4. insufficient evidence for sc/st act offence (Para 18 , 19)
5. court modifies conviction and sentences (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

M.G. UMA, J.

-

The appellant in Crl.A. No.200104/2018 being accused No.1, the appellant in Crl.A. No.200100/2019 being accused No.2 and the appellant in Crl.A. No.200098/2018 being accused No.4 in Special Case (S.C.) No.23/2013 on the file of the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur, are impugning the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, convicting them along with accused Nos.3 and 5 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 504, 307 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 3(i)(x) of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentencing them as under :

“Acting under Section 143 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 6 months and also to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.

-

Acting under Section 147 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 2 years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.

Acting under Section 148 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 3 years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.

Acting under Section 323 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of three months.

Acting under Section 504 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused No.1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of two years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.

Acting under Section 307 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of 10 years and also to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo R.I. for a further period of six months.

-

Acting under Section 3(1) (10) of SC/ST Act, the accused No.2 2 is hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of two years and also to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.

All the sentences run concurrently.”

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, PW1 lodged the first information with Market Yard Police Station, Raichur, against accused Nos.1 to 3, alleging commission of the offences punishable under Sections 307 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The injured PW2 was admitted to the hospital and was treated. Statements of the injured and the eyewitnesses were recorded. After completing the investigation, charge-sheet came to be filed against all the accused for the aforesaid offences.

-

3. Learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences and committed the matter to the learned Sessions Judge (Trial Court). The Trial Court summoned accused Nos.1 to 5. They have appeared before the Trial Judge and pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 4. The prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the accused, have examined 17 witnesses as PWs.1 to 17, got marked 15 documents as per Exs.P1 to P15 and identified M.O. 1 to 3 in support of its contention. Accused have denied all the incriminating materials available on record, but have not led any evidence in their defence.

5. The Trial Court after takin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top