IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
M.G. UMA, J.
Amaresha, S/o. Bangarappa – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Addl. State Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 200098 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS)) C/W Criminal Appeal No. 200100 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS)) Criminal Appeal No. 200104 of 2018 (374(Cr.PC)/415(BNSS))
Decided On : 05-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused convicted under ipc and sc/st act (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution witnesses corroborate assault evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. description of injuries not sufficient for section 307 ipc (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. insufficient evidence for sc/st act offence (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. court modifies conviction and sentences (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
M.G. UMA, J.
-
The appellant in Crl.A. No.200104/2018 being accused No.1, the appellant in Crl.A. No.200100/2019 being accused No.2 and the appellant in Crl.A. No.200098/2018 being accused No.4 in Special Case (S.C.) No.23/2013 on the file of the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur, are impugning the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, convicting them along with accused Nos.3 and 5 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 504, 307 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 3(i)(x) of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentencing them as under :
“Acting under Section 143 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 6 months and also to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.
-
Acting under Section 147 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 2 years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.
Acting under Section 148 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 3 years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.
Acting under Section 323 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of three months.
Acting under Section 504 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused No.1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of two years and also to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.
Acting under Section 307 R/w Section 149 of IPC, the accused 1 to 5 are hereby sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of 10 years and also to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default to pay the fine to undergo R.I. for a further period of six months.
-
Acting under Section 3(1) (10) of SC/ST Act, the accused No.2 2 is hereby sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of two years and also to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to pay the fine to undergo S.I. for a further period of two months.
All the sentences run concurrently.”
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, PW1 lodged the first information with Market Yard Police Station, Raichur, against accused Nos.1 to 3, alleging commission of the offences punishable under Sections 307 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The injured PW2 was admitted to the hospital and was treated. Statements of the injured and the eyewitnesses were recorded. After completing the investigation, charge-sheet came to be filed against all the accused for the aforesaid offences.
-
3. Learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences and committed the matter to the learned Sessions Judge (Trial Court). The Trial Court summoned accused Nos.1 to 5. They have appeared before the Trial Judge and pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 4. The prosecution in order to prove the guilt of the accused, have examined 17 witnesses as PWs.1 to 17, got marked 15 documents as per Exs.P1 to P15 and identified M.O. 1 to 3 in support of its contention. Accused have denied all the incriminating materials available on record, but have not led any evidence in their defence.
5. The Trial Court after takin
Court affirmed convictions for assault under IPC but reversed those for attempted murder and caste-based abuse due to lack of evidence, emphasizing intent and corroborative testimony.
The court held that reliance on inconsistent and insufficient witness testimonies, alongside lack of medical evidence for grievous injuries, invalidates the conviction, necessitating acquittal.
Credibility of witness testimony is critical, as inconsistencies and reliance on interested parties undermine the prosecution’s case, especially amid ongoing civil disputes.
For conviction under the SC/ST Act, prosecution must prove both caste identity and an intent to harm due to that identity; lack of such proof invalidates the charge.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and significant inconsistencies in witness statements can lead to acquittal.
The prosecution must prove all elements of an offence beyond reasonable doubt; insufficient evidence led to a conviction modification from Section 307 to Section 324 IPC.
No prima facie case for framing charges under IPC 307 absent life-endangering intention on non-vital injuries; SC/ST Act inapplicable sans public-heard caste slurs, corroboration, amid rivalry and FI....
The judgment confirms that a conviction can stand under IPC while acquitting charges under SC & ST (PoA) Act due to lack of sufficient evidence.
To convict under SC/ST Act, evidence must show the crime was motivated by the victim's caste; mere membership is insufficient without demonstrable bias.
The necessity of independent and impartial witnesses in cases under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to substantiate claims of public humiliation and intimidation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.